My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
11-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:28:14 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 4:28:04 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> how to conserve and protect these unique attributes through changes to the city's <br /> comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, and public education. <br /> Process <br /> Phase I—Identifying%y Issues <br /> The first major task of the project involved identifying the key attributes of the Orono <br /> landscape that axe affiliated with the community's rural character and potentially affected <br /> by growth. . <br /> First meeting, August 10, 2004: At this workshop city council members provided <br /> responses to a c�u�est�onnaire� prepared by pthe cons ltants�Tlu�ose o th� <br /> .�- �,��,�r��R�, <br /> �questionnaire was;to idenhfy and prior�tize the comrriunity assets that these policy°makers <br /> �wanted to protect and'reachy,consensus�'abouts�e 'adv,,,�,,erse`effects�'of d,evelopment�;t�iati <br /> threaten•.th,�e�image and'�character tliey suppoi'f�. These questionnaires were tabulated and <br /> presented to the council and thNe subsequent discussion guided the direction of the <br /> remainder of the study. <br /> Visual Preference Surve��ust, 2004: Orono city officials were given disposable <br /> cameras and instructed to take photographs of I mages and elements that they want to <br /> maintain and those that captured features and characteristics they did not want to see in <br /> � the city. Each participant used one camera for positive photos and another for negative. <br /> The cameras were returned to the consultant, who developed, compiled, and arranged the <br /> images for presentation and discussion. <br /> The above steps were essential in establishing a framework for the analysis, concept <br /> . �development schemes, and design standards described in this CPA and related <br /> documents. <br /> Phase II—Analysis <br /> By combining the comments from the workshop, results of the visual preference survey, <br /> MLCCS data, and ecological fieldwork, the consultants were able to establish a <br /> methodology for analyzing the Orono landscape. The second phase of the Rural Oasis <br /> project entailed an aesthetic and ecological analysis of significant undeveloped parcels in <br /> the city. The analysis focused on 3 potential development sites and 10 important roadway <br /> corridors that were selected by city staff. <br /> Second Meetin�, January 12, 2005: City Council members, Planning Commission <br /> members, parks and Recreation Commission members, and city staff attended a <br /> workshop that covered the following topics: <br /> :• A discussion of the background and purpose of the study. <br /> • A summary of the study process for the Rural Oasis Proj ect. <br /> • A presentation of the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) as <br /> it applies to Orono, in order to establish a baseline�ecology for the city and <br /> execute an ecological analysis. <br /> City of Orono DSU Inc <br /> � <br /> Draft CPA 4 August, 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.