My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-10-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
12-10-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:09:26 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 4:04:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ill <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 10, 2007 <br />7:00 o7clock p.m. <br />( #07 -3332 PRC Development Company, <br />McMillan noted there is a trail along Highway 6 currently and asked if the trail Mrs. Seeland is speaking <br />of would be located along Homestead. <br />Seeland stated the trail would be along Homestead and that currently a number of kids and bikes utilize <br />that road. Seeland noted that in Medina city streets have been closed to trucks, which has created an <br />unsafe condition along Homestead {county road} land that some steps should be taken to improve that <br />situation. <br />McMillan commented the western side of Homestead would make more sense for a trail. <br />Seeland stated it does not matter to her what side of the road the trail is located on and that she would be <br />willing to put it on their side of the road if the Council wishes. Seeland stated it is her understanding the <br />Three Rivers Park is only able to develop 20 percent of their land and that they are very close to that <br />amount presently. <br />White stated the City should look at the overall area to determine which side of the road would be more <br />ideal for the trail. <br />Seeland stated the property owned by Bushbaum is an ideal spot to start the trail and that in her opinion <br />someone from the City should approach her about purchasing the property. <br />White commented he appreciates the applicant b <br />Murphy asked what the City's normal fence heig <br />Turner stated under certain circumstances a prop <br />domestic animals and that the typical height of a <br />Murphy asked if the fence is intended to be more <br />Seeland stated it would be. <br />willing to accommodate a trail on their property. <br />restriction is. <br />owner is allowed 60 inches if they are enclosing <br />�e is 42 inches. <br />decorative in nature. <br />Murphy stated his fence is 42 inches in height and consists of three boards and questioned whether the <br />City would be setting a precedent if they agreed to a fence that is higher than 42 inches. Murphy asked <br />if the fence would be painted or left natural. :I <br />Seeland indicated it would probably be stained. <br />Bremer asked what the rationale is for the 60 i <br />Seeland stated the 60 inches is required to <br />Murphy stated in his opinion the 60 -inch fence v <br />rest of the project is fine in his opinion. <br />Seeland asked whether the fence would be more <br />four boards. <br />be setting a precedent. Murphy commented the <br />kAGE 5 <br />located further back into the woods. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.