Laserfiche WebLink
fi <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 10, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #07 -3323 Structures Unlimited, Continued) <br />*This item was reopened following the Mayor /City Council Report. <br />6. #07 -3324 ANN MAXFIELD, 4175 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCE <br />Turner stated Staff is requesting direction on this'application. The Planning Commission has <br />recommended that a temporary variance be granted to allow the fence to remain for an interim period of <br />time while the owner re- establishes vegetative screening. The variance will expire on December 31, <br />2008, and the fence is to be removed by that date! If the fence is not removed, the City may remove the <br />fence and assess the cost to the property. <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to direct <br />the recommendations of the Planning Comn <br />7. #07 -3325 GARY DeSANTIS, 80 WEA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5702 <br />Gary DeSantis, Applicant, and Mark Gronberg, LE <br />is Curtis stated the applicant has submitted an appli <br />property within the RR -113 District, which requir <br />per lot. The proposal consists of the division of c <br />parcels. A lot width variance would be required i <br />Wear Lane meets the 200 foot minimum width r( <br />proposed new lots will meet the minimum width <br />U <br />At its November meeting, the Planning Comm: <br />variances and preliminary plat as requested. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot <br />following conditions: <br />1. The plat shall be subject to the City En <br />Amundsen). <br />2. That the applicant upgrade Wear Lane <br />City standards. <br />3. The plat shall adhere to all MCWD rec <br />Staff recommends adoption of the resolution al <br />to draft an approval resolution incorporating <br />i. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />LANE — PRELIMINARY PLAT — <br />, were present. <br />ation for a subdivision for a two -lot residential plat of <br />s 2 -acres of dry buildable area and 200 feet of width <br />ie existing 5 -acre parcel resulting in two 2 plus acre <br />r each of the newly created lot. The existing lot at 80 <br />[uirement at the building setback. Neither of the <br />t the building setback. <br />voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the lot width <br />variances and the preliminary plat with the <br />s recommendations (both John Smyth and Darren <br />the cul -de -sac as well as pave the cul -de -sac to meet <br />to the Council Action memo. <br />White noted this is an odd shaped lot and that it is difficult to create two totally conforming lots. <br />PAGE 3 <br />iI <br />