My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-26-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:09:13 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:59:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r � <br />U <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 26, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*4. #07 -3317 DAN BESSBURG WITH <br />AFTER -THE -FACT VARIANCE — <br />Murphy moved, Rahn seconded, to adopt <br />Variances for the Property Located at 774 <br />*5. #07 -3322 ROBERT AND JORDANN, <br />VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5695 <br />Murphy moved, Rahn seconded, to adopt <br />Variances for the Property Located at 845 <br />6. #07 -3323 STRUCTURES UP <br />CHAMPLIN, 210 BIG ISLAND — V <br />Ross Langhans, Structures Unlimited, and <br />7RG HOMES, 774 TONKAWA ROAD, <br />NO. 5694 <br />UTION NO. 5694, a Resolution Granting <br />Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />WILLIAMS, 845 WILLOW DRIVE SOUTH — <br />UTION NO. 5695, a Resolution Granting <br />Drive South. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />ON BEHALF OF JUDSON AND ALEYA <br />and Aleya Champlin, Applicants, were present. <br />Turner stated the applicants are requesting Lakeshore setback and hardcover variances to construct an <br />addition to the rear of the existing seasonal dwelling as well as add a second story to it. A foundation <br />type variance is requested to allow the addition to be constructed on post footings rather than a <br />perimeter foundation. The retaining wall portion of this application was approved by Council on <br />November 13, 2007. This portion of the application was delayed because the applicants were out of the <br />country and they wished to be present when this portion of the application was heard by the Council. <br />At their October meeting, the Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the <br />variances subject to the pitch of the roof being reduced to 10:12 and a landscaping plan for screening <br />being submitted for Staff review prior to the City Council meeting. <br />Rather than reduce the roof height, the applicant has reduced the height of the side walls ten inches. <br />This is the same amount the reduction in roof pi ich would have reduced the peak height. The applicant <br />also increased the roof overhang to two feet, which lowered the height of the eave line slightly. <br />PAGE 11 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.