Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 13, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(3. #07 -3305 LAKE CO UNTR Y B UILDERS ON BEHALF OF JAMES ZIMMERMAN, 2 745 <br />SHADYWOOD ROAD, Continued) <br />options forward. Both of these options generally met the direction given at the previous meeting. Only <br />one of the Commissioners at the September meeting was in attendance at the previous meeting. Upon <br />reviewing the applicant's revised proposal, the Commission generally felt that the applicant's request <br />was unreasonable and discussed denial. The applicant was taken by surprise at this conclusion, and <br />rather than having the application denied by the Planning Commission, requested their application be <br />tabled. <br />At the October Planning Commission meeting, the applicants again presented their revised options. The <br />Planning Commission discussed the revised options with the applicant. The Planning Commission and <br />the applicant wanted clarification on the fire marshal's requirements for driveway widths and other <br />items. Additionally, the applicant brought up a number of potential solutions to address the driveway <br />hardcover overage, specifically pervious pavers or grass pavers. The Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to <br />recommend. approval of the request as long as the existing-hardcover level was not exceeded and <br />resulted in a driveway configuration that the fire marshal would approve. The dissenting commissioner <br />felt that the further encroachment toward the lake was excessive. <br />r <br />.• <br />The applicant has provided revised plans which incorporate the driveway specifications required by the <br />fire marshal. Due to removing the curve in the driveway, the applicant has provided a revised request <br />for the garage portion of the home. The revision results in a straightening out of the garages, where <br />previously the line of the house was more "stepped" to follow the curve in the driveway. This revision <br />in the house footprint results in an additional 231 square feet of structural coverage changing the a <br />percentage from 13.6 percent to 14.3 percent. <br />Staff recommends denial of the lake setback variances as proposed as a further encroachment toward the <br />lake is not reasonable. Staff is supportive of hardcover variances that do not result in an increase in total <br />hardcover. Curtis noted the 120 -day application review period expires on November 18'b and that the <br />applicant will need to provide a written request to extend it an additional 60 days. <br />Zimmerman stated he has resided on the property for over 13 years, with the house being built in 1959. <br />The residence currently consists of 2,900 square feet. The property contains a boathouse and the lot is <br />considered nonconforming. <br />The objectives for this project were to design something that was better for Lake Minnetonka and the <br />environment, would be supported and embraced by the neighbors, would fit in and be appropriate for <br />the site and the neighborhood, and would improve the value of the property. <br />Zimmerman indicated he has worked with the DNR to develop their lakeside vegetation plan, and <br />following that work a few years back, he has added a significant amount of shoreline vegetation to the <br />property. With almost 600 feet of shoreline, rain gardens would be a significant benefit to Lake <br />Minnetonka. The plan is also hardcover neutral, and with the incorporation of the rain gardens, would <br />be significantly better for the lake. Zimmerman pointed out on the overhead the areas of the proposed <br />rain gardens. <br />Zimmerman indicated he has been in contact with all his neighbors, who are supportive of the project, <br />and that he is not aware of any opposition by any of the neighbors to what he is proposing. The <br />neighbors feel the plans are appropriate. The proposal helps to modernize the home and improve the <br />PAGE 2 of 14 <br />