My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
11-13-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:08:57 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:58:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />r� <br />MINUTES OF TAE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 13, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(8. #07 -3336 MARC ASHTON WITH JOHN TERRANCE HOMES, LLC, ON BEHALF OF <br />MITCH COOK OF CENTRAL BANKAND LAR YPALM OF LGL REAL ESTATE <br />INVESTMENTS, STONEBAYOUTLOTA -Continued) <br />Curtis stated as part of the preliminary plat resoli <br />to be paid prior to final plat approval. <br />White inquired what amount is involved relating <br />Cook indicated their fees add up to <br />Palm stated with the letter of credit, it is over <br />Turner stated in addition to the approval of the p <br />construct the buildings and that the way the fees <br />at the time of final plat approval. <br />Palm stated as it concerns the letter of credit on <br />Kellogg stated the applicant could provide three <br />credit is calculated on their estimate of the costs. <br />Curtis stated the required letter of credit for lot <br />approval, the fees were outlined and are required <br />fees. <br />$137,000. <br />M <br />the applicants would also be receiving approval to <br />structured in the resolution, the fees would be-due <br />lot, in his opinion it is excessive. <br />to their office but that typically the letter of <br />is $500,920 and on lot two is $408,551. <br />Palm stated they are required to post half a million dollars on a project that they will.not be starting until <br />after the winter, which will force them to incur additional expense. <br />Cook stated he was not aware of the fees until recently and that it is not as big of an issue for their lot as <br />it is for the LGL lot since they will be starting construction s in the near future. <br />Turner noted there are two types of SAC and WAC charges that are required and that one of the SAC <br />and WAC charges is payments in lieu of assessments and the other SAC and WAC charges will go to <br />the Metropolitan Council. I <br />Palm indicated he is not questioning the amount <br />White suggested the applicants make a proposal 1 <br />would not be approved for another two weeks. <br />Cook stated it was his understanding the fees woi <br />Palm stated that has been his experience as well 1 <br />White recommended Staff consider that proposal <br />merely the timing of the payment. <br />the city on the fees, noting that this application <br />be due at the time the permit was issued. <br />the City of Medina. <br />the applicants. <br />Gaffron stated after reviewing the development agreement, the interior street system, the sidewalks and <br />the common areas are to be privately owned and maintained with the exception of the public trail <br />• located along Willow Drive. The bicycle /pedestri an trail would be constructed by the developer in <br />conjunction with phase one to ensure that the area intended for trail is not commercially developed, <br />i <br />PAGE 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.