My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-23-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:08:02 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:52:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 23, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(2006 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Continued) <br />White noted the City's tax capacity is the lowest in Hennepin County. White stated he did review the <br />change in the state law regarding employee events and that the state has basically said that those types of <br />events are okay. <br />McMillan inquired whether there are any guidelines available for division of staff responsibilities for a <br />city of this size. <br />Malloy stated they do have some guidelines and have provided that information to Staff. Malloy noted <br />they also look at division of duties during the audit. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this matter. <br />4. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — DICK KROEGER, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Mr. Kroeger stated he had nothing to report but would be available for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None • <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />4. #05 -3143 DAN HESSBURG, 774 TONKAWA ROAD — REVIEW UNAPPROVED <br />GRADING <br />Dan Hessburg, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated in 2005, the applicant submitted plans and worked through the variance review process, <br />revising plans in response to Planning Commission concerns. Based on a specific set of building plans <br />and site plan which the Planning Commission and Council found acceptable, lot area and lot width <br />variances for a house were granted in addition to a hardcover variance within the 75 -250 foot zone <br />permitting 27.2 percent hardcover where 25 percent is normally allowed and within the 250 -500 foot zone <br />to allow 459 square feet or 45 percent where 30 percent is normally allowed for the new residence. <br />During the inspection process, the City's building inspector noted that the site grading did not match the <br />approved grading plan and the hardcover exceeded approved levels. Additionally, the applicant <br />conducted grading within the 0 -75 foot zone to construct an unpermitted lake access stair. <br />The as -built plan reflects excesses in hardcover within the 0 -75 foot zone, the 75 -250 foot zone, and the <br />250 -500 foot zone. Within the 0 -75 foot zone, there was an existing wooden staircase, and in its place has <br />been constructed a stone staircase, which accounts for 360 square feet of hardcover, along with an <br />undetermined amount of earth movement. • <br />PAGE 2 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.