My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-25-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:40 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:51:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday,' <br />7:00 o <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />;S OF THE <br />)UNCIL MEETING <br />une 25, 2007 <br />,lock p.m. <br />*4. #06 -3196 PATRICK MCNAUGHTON/EDWARD HAMM, 1391 FOX STREET AND 1401 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE — EXTEND PRELB11NARY PLAT APPROVAL — RESOLUTION NO. <br />5631 <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt l <br />Six Month Extension to the Effective Period of <br />Resolution NO. 5489. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*5. #07 -3259 LAKE COUNTRY BUILDI <br />GANGSTEE,1374 REST POINT ROAD — V. <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt l <br />• Variances and a Conditional Use Permit and V <br />Road. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #07 -3296 SUZANNE AND TERRY JOl <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5633 <br />Suzanne Johnson, Applicant, was present. • <br />Bremer stated some members of the Planning G <br />entryway and that the stairs could be redesigned <br />Curtis stated the applicants' original survey did not <br />which encroached into the side yard. That angled r <br />setback is required. <br />)N NO. 5631, a Resolution Granting a <br />Plat Approval Established Per <br />ON BEHALF OF KATHY AND GARY <br />ANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5632 <br />UTION NO. 5632, a Resolution Granting <br />for the property located at 1374 Rest Point <br />543 PARK LANE — VARIANCE - <br />:)n had a concern regarding the appearance of the <br />the 10 -foot setback. <br />that the front entry stairs had an angled portion <br />results in an 8.3 foot setback where a 10 -foot <br />Murphy inquired whether this application was before the City Council previously. <br />Curtis stated this application as it relates to the overhangs was discussed during the public comment <br />portion of a previous City Council meeting. Curtis stated the overhang had been included on the <br />applicants' plans the entire time but that City Staff ,aid not catch it at the time it was before the Planning <br />Commission. The overhang encroachment was noticed at the time the applicants applied for their <br />building permit. I. <br />Bremer stated if the entry came off the side rather tl <br />• entryway. <br />PAG <br />the front, they would be allowed to have a larger <br />3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.