My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:23 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:49:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY ( <br />• Monday, <br />7:00 o <br />• <br />1►J <br />( #07 -3251 Mandeep & Leisa Sodhi, Continued) <br />applicants have reduced hardcover on their propert <br />was made in 2001 while the increase in hardcover i <br />reduced to at least 2001 levels and preferably to 25 <br />Turner noted that Building Inspector Bruce Vang di <br />have a water problem. In his opinion the front patio <br />toward the foundation and is uncertain whether the <br />problem. <br />Mrs. Sodhi stated she did bring a photograph this ei <br />purchased the house going down to the bluff area. <br />requires that a portion of the deck be removed, whi< <br />Turner stated the shaded part of the overhead is the <br />Mrs. Sodhi pointed out the landscape beds located <br />remove the fabric. Since they purchased the prope <br />have also removed a substantial amount of the nox <br />and drainage have been made on the lot and some <br />their belief they have reduced the size of the deck <br />was approved at 26 percent. <br />OF THE <br />WCIL MEETING <br />y 14, 2007 <br />ck p.m. <br />since they purchased it, the reduction in hardcover <br />:curred in 2005. Staff recommends that hardcover be <br />I meet with the applicants and has confirmed they do <br />is probably needed to keep water from draining <br />ibric under the planting beds is helping the water <br />ling showing the steps from the time they originally <br />e previously approved variance for the deck <br />they are willing to do. <br />of the deck that currently encroaches. <br />,ay from the house and stated they are willing to <br />they have reduced the hardcover on the lot and . <br />is weeds. In addition, improvements to the runoff <br />wining walls have been removed. Sodhi stated it is <br />m what previously existed. In 2001, the hardcover <br />i <br />McMillan inquired whether a table and chairs would fit in that area on the deck. <br />Mrs. Sodhi stated that area is basically a walkway. <br />Mr. Sodhi noted they have made a number of imp <br />including the removal of the stairway, which has <br />the deck and that some of the issues relate to the <br />also tiled their entire basement after experiencing <br />steps to help correct the runoff into the basement. <br />McMillan inquired whether the deck was recently <br />Mr. Sodhi stated the deck was replaced three years <br />deck. At the time the deck was replaced, they did <br />configuration, which eliminated the need to step in <br />McMillan inquired whether they obtained a permit <br />Mr. Sodhi stated they did not since they needed to <br />son's birthday party the next day. Sodhi stated thf <br />Commission. <br />McMillan noted the Planning Commission <br />'ements to the property since they purchased it, <br />.iced the hardcover on the lot. The issue is the size of <br />foot setback and how the lot is laid out. They have <br />ter in their basement twice and have taken other <br />;o after a construction worker fell through the rotten <br />Luce the size of the deck and changed the <br />the neighbor's property when exiting the deck. <br />the work on the deck. <br />place the deck rather quickly to accommodate their <br />are okay with the recommendation of the Planning <br />PAGE 9 <br />a five foot setback for the deck. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.