Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, <br />7:00 o' <br />( #06 -3225 David Carlson, Continued) <br />3. One significant revision between the Au <br />a three foot side building setback rather <br />applicant have recently been advised by <br />and two foot overhang setback will be r( <br />the site plan and plat drawings. <br />4. The site layout was revised to allow for ad <br />plans also include the appropriate wetland <br />Staff and the City Engineer continue to rec <br />Code. Applicants have proposed a 20 -fool <br />parking, storm water management, and im <br />ultimately required. The Fire Marshal has <br />No Parking. Parking on one side would re <br />require expansion to 32 feet. <br />OF THE <br />FNCIL MEETING <br />y 14, 2007 <br />ek p.m. <br />t 2006 and November 2006 plans was to establish <br />i the zero -lot -line layout initially proposed. Staff and <br />Building Official that a five foot foundation setback <br />red. This will potentially result in minor revisions to <br />quate on -site parking for each residence. The revised <br />buffer setbacks. Road width remains a potential issue. <br />�mmend a 28 foot road width as required by .City <br />!road width and are prepared to discuss the issues of <br />)acts on building separation if the 28 foot standard is <br />indicated that a 20 foot roadway will have to be posted <br />quire a 24 foot road; parking on both sides would <br />5. In November, the Planning Commission discussed the potential impacts of this development on <br />the Luce Line and ways to mitigate those impacts. DNR review will be required -for any proposed <br />connections to the trail. <br />j <br />6. The preliminary plat has each lot extending through the wetland, with individual ownership of <br />wetland rather than association ownership.) The applicants feel this will help their marketing by <br />being able to sell larger lots. The City has approved plats and RPDs with wetlands both in <br />individual lots as well as in association -oed outlots. Council may wish to discuss the pros and <br />w <br />cons of each method. 7 <br />7. Access to the site will be via the existing <br />and Hennepin County about a possible ro <br />and Wayzata Boulevard are ongoing. Ac <br />been an issue of late, and there may be fu <br />property. <br />8. The City Engineer and Fire Marshal have <br />Gaffron stated Staff is generally supportive of the i <br />expected to approve the CMP amendment on May <br />to be resolved, the basic concept and general site 1; <br />Plan Approval and Preliminary Plat Approval reso <br />David Carlson addressed the City Council regardi. <br />plans for each unit consist of cedar shingle siding, <br />each unit is handicap accessible. The lower level <br />the occupants and would also include a bathroom. <br />White requested the applicant address the points <br />;way access location. Discussions with MnDOT <br />about replacing the semaphore at Old Highway 12 <br />to the Montessori School across Highway 12 has <br />access revisions that will affect the applicants' <br />the plans and have provided their comments. <br />unit development. The Metropolitan Council is <br />Although a variety of engineering details have yet <br />L appear to be sufficient to allow for a Concept <br />n to be drafted. <br />his application. Carlson stated the final building <br />deck, and an eight -foot walkout. The first floor of <br />each unit is designed to house guests or children of <br />by Staff. <br />PAGE 5 <br />'I <br />