Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />L <br />• <br />ORONO CITY ( <br />Monday, <br />7:00 o <br />(Public Comments — Terry Johnson, Continu <br />Murphy inquired whether there would be any is <br />Johnson stated the neighbors have reviewed the <br />Bremer stated she is not aware of a side yard se <br />would be an encroachment. <br />Johnson stated the stairway encroaches <br />S OF THE <br />IUNCIL MEETING <br />lay 14, 2007 <br />lock p.m. <br />with runoff given the two -foot overhang. <br />and they have signed off on the project. <br />being granted in the resolution and that the stairway <br />:ely 19 inches into the setback. <br />Curtis stated the applicant did submit plans this morning showing a straightened stairway, which does not <br />encroach into the setback. <br />Murphy stated he is in favor of the revised stairway and allowing the two foot overhang. <br />Rahn stated he is in agreement with Council Member Murphy. <br />Bremer inquired how Staff was not aware of the two -foot overhang. <br />Johnson stated their plans have always depicted the, two feet. <br />Bremer stated in the City of Orono 18 inches is the <br />overhang relates to drainage, massing, and peak he <br />have been aware of this. <br />Johnson reiterated that the 24 -inch overhang has <br />beginning. <br />Rahn stated it sounds like the building plans were <br />process. Rahn commented he does not remember <br />Commission. <br />Murphy stated in his view this matter should be rf <br />during the public comments section of the meetin <br />lard overhang and that the restriction on the <br />Bremer stated she is unsure how Staff could not <br />been depicted on their plans right from the <br />submitted as they went through the application <br />.ewing this application while he was on the Planning <br />in more detail by Staff rather than discuss it <br />McMillan commented it appears that the Council is in agreement with the straightened stairway and that <br />the overhang issue is a little more complicated. <br />Mattick stated the overhang was not part of the original variance application and that the applicant would <br />need to submit a variance application for the overhang. Mattick stated what was approved by the Council <br />does not include the two -foot overhang. - <br />Ralui inquired whether a building permit could be granted. Rahn stated it is not a big issue to cut back the <br />rafters. I <br />Mattick stated a conditional variance could be app ' ved but that the variance would need to go through <br />the application process. <br />PAGE 3 <br />