Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, <br />7:00 o' <br />( #07 -3283 Steven Sigel, Continued) <br />Due to the location of the applicant's home and the <br />variance can be administratively approved. The pn <br />An extensive deck system currently serves as a side <br />would also like to remove the wooden decks and re <br />are an issue. Finally, the existing retaining wall sy: <br />as the twenty plus year old timber walls are beginn: <br />OF THE <br />rNCIL MEETING <br />14, 2007 <br />p.m. <br />0 <br />Ldjacent homes, an average lakeshore setback <br />ect, however, requires additional land use approvals. <br />valk from the driveway to the home. The applicant <br />lace the paver path as maintenance and snow removal <br />em is proposed to be reconstructed and reconfigured <br />ig to show their age. <br />l <br />The Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the variances and conditional use permit <br />as requested. The dissenting Commissioner felt that pervious pavers should be utilized. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcoi <br />conditional use permit for the wall construction. Tl <br />to a recently submitted revision, and Staff recomme <br />accordance with the City Engineer's recommendatii <br />Rahn stated in his opinion this is a perfect use for <br />Sigel stated he did discuss the use of permeable l <br />concern the pavers would retain water during the <br />experiencing. <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, Application <br />Staff to draft a resolution approving the reque <br />16. #07 -3284 SHARRATT DESI <br />VARIANCE /CUP <br />Michael Sharratt, Architect, and Tom and Kristen <br />Curtis stated the applicants are proposing to constn <br />existing home and are also proposing to remove exi <br />property to offset the additional hardcover of the pc <br />250 -500 foot zone. The home was built in 2001 by <br />within the 75 -250 foot zone. Currently, the propert <br />foot zone and the 250 -500 foot zone; therefore, a h, <br />variances as proposed as well as approval of the <br />City Engineer has requested some minor revisions <br />Is that the applicant revise the proposed plan in <br />s prior to final Council review. <br />pavers. <br />with his contractor and that he expressed a <br />r and become icy, which is what they are currently <br />-3283, Steven Sigel, 1399 Park Drive, to direct <br />variances. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />SHARRATT, 2507 KELLEY AVENUE — <br />Applicants, were present. <br />t a 648 square foot in- ground pool lakeward of the <br />nsive areas of driveway on the street side of the <br />1 and patio. Portions of this hardcover are within the <br />Ze previous owner with a conforming 25 percent <br />has non - conforming hardcover within the 75 -250 <br />dcover review is required. <br />The Planning Commission voted 6 -0 to recommend approval of the variance in conjunction with the <br />removal of an additional 300 square feet of hardcover from within the 75 -250 foot zone. The applicants <br />are proposing to remove extensive areas of the driveway on the street side of the property in an effort to <br />offset the additional hardcover for the pool and patio. Consistent with the Planning Commission's <br />recommendation, the applicants have removed an additional 300 square feet. The applicants' request now <br />consists of a hardcover variance within the 75 -250 foot zone of 28.57 percent where 25 percent is <br />normally allowed, and 25 percent was previously approved with the construction of the home. The 250- <br />500 foot zone has been reduced from 30.22 percent existing to a level of 22.7 percent proposed. <br />PAGE 23_ <br />