My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2007
>
05-04-2007 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 4:07:23 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 3:49:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 1 <br />• <br />• <br />ORONO CITY C <br />Monday, <br />7:00 of <br />*12. #07 -3272 KERN HOPPE,1150 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5614 <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, to adopt RE <br />Preliminary Plat Approval. VOTE: Ayes 5, N <br />13. #07 -3277 SUSAN NELSON, 500 <br />Susan Nelson, Applicant, was present. <br />Turner stated the applicant is requesting setback vai <br />house, one with a 46.4 foot setback and one with a, <br />property line is required in both situations. <br />The applicant presented a revised proposal to the P] <br />divided into two additions. The addition behind thf <br />and storage area for outdoor items. The master bat] <br />and storage closet. At its closest point this addition <br />addition behind the other end of the house would pi <br />point it would be 44.7 feet from the rear property li <br />At its April meeting the Planning Commission <br />proposal, and the dissenting Commissioner felt <br />Turner noted the applicant has submitted some <br />behind the garage complies with the setback. S <br />room addition and whether the six -foot setback <br />Nelson stated the storage addition is for her husb <br />originally constructed, the house was built even <br />in its present location to prevent water problems. <br />OF THE <br />INCIL MEETING <br />y 14, 2007 <br />ek p.m. <br />ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT — <br />LUTION NO. 5614, a Resolution Granting <br />0. <br />ROAD — VARIANCE <br />ices to construct two additions to the rear of her <br />7 foot setback. A 50 -foot setback from the rear <br />inning Commission. The addition was smaller and <br />garage would provide for a mudroom, laundry area, <br />would be expanded into existing laundry/mudroom <br />would be 46.4 feet from the rear property line. The <br />avide for a larger informal dining area. At its closest <br />5 to 1 to recommend approval of the revised <br />were other options available. <br />revisions today and that the storage addition <br />some reservations regarding the size of the dining <br />chment is justified. <br />'s tools. Nelson stated at the time the structure was <br />. the street. Nelson indicated the addition is proposed <br />Rahn inquired whether any thought has been given' to relocating the whole addition or not extending it as <br />far out to make it more compliant. <br />Nelson stated they are basically following the d <br />There is also an existing stairway in the interior <br />relocated. <br />Rahn stated in his view the dining room addition di <br />this is a two -acre parcel that is currently conformin <br />to the plan. Rahn inquired whether the applicant's <br />setback. <br />Nelson stated he is. <br />and that the dining room accesses off of the kitchen. <br />he house that prevents the addition from being . <br />s not need to extend as far out as it does. Rahn noted <br />and that in his view there should be some revisions <br />wilder was aware that the plans encroached into the <br />PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.