Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � O ' V <br /> O O ' <br /> ' � CITY of URONO <br /> �� . <br /> ,� ,:� ti <br /> `� �' ��, �:�' ti <br /> '� O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L�kEsH�4� N0. � � `�`' <br /> E. No action was taken by the applicant, and he sold the property to the <br /> owners in January 2003. <br /> F. In February and March 2003 the Buildin� Official sent letters to the <br /> applicant in a further attempt to gain compliance, which resulted in this <br /> application. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the increases in structural coveraae and encroachment <br /> of a second story 5' into the average lakeshore setback must necessarily be <br /> granted in conjunction with any after-the-fact approval of the second story deck. <br /> 6. The City Council finds that �vhile the second story deck construction should not <br /> have occurred, denial of the after-the-fact variances would unfairly penalize the <br /> owners who purchased the property from the applicant with no knowledge that <br /> the deck was not in compliance. <br /> 7. The Council further finds that the circumstance that the City failed to file a <br /> timely written notice to the applicant of the violations act as a hardship which <br /> supports the grantin� of the requested after-the-fact variances. <br /> 8. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; tha� <br /> grantin� the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or .difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> w�elfare of the community. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />