Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday !April 9, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(13. #07 -3270 MILD H. THOMPSON, 3135 <br />Curtis pointed out that there is a fair amount of ve <br />entrance of the house is visible from the roadway. <br />Sweitzer indicated they are also proposing a fair a� <br />further screen the house. <br />Bremer stated she likes the variation in the roof <br />Curtis noted the house does meet the City's 30 <br />CIRCLE, Continued) <br />on this property and that basically only the <br />t of landscaping along the property lines to help <br />i vation. <br />qt height restriction. <br />McMillan pointed out that technically the whole li <br />of the peak and that the decrease in the height hell <br />Sweitzer stated the property owner has spoken wi <br />not opposed to the project. <br />White stated in his view the tower is reasonable si <br />Rahn moved, McMillan seconded, to direct <br />conditional use permit as outlined in Staff s <br />3135 Casco Circle. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />14. #07 -3271 JUDSON M. DAYTON, 825 <br />PLAN: NEW LOTS <br />Judson Dayton, Applicant; John Winston, Attorn <br />Zislow, Attorney -at -Law appearing on behalf of <br />Gaffron noted this is a sketch plan review and tha <br />existing tax parcels and subdivide the property to' <br />large parcel for the existing residence, caretaker b <br />served by two private driveway outlots over the t; <br />Road. The easterly of the two existing smaller pa <br />parcels contains a variety of small outbuildings of <br />Each of the four lots abuts the lakeshore of Maxv <br />area and 200 feet in width measured at the shorel <br />and 4 have functional lot widths of 170 to 190 fey <br />feet once the 30 -foot side setbacks are accounted <br />Lot 2 abuts a public or private road. Lot 1 is pi <br />Outlot B, a variable -width corridor in which ex <br />are proposed to gain access to Old Crystal Bay <br />exists a second driveway. <br />gth of the house could be constructed as the height <br />to reduce the massing on the lot: <br />the two adjoining property owners and that they are <br />it helps to reduce the massing. <br />to draft a resolution approving the variances and <br />rt dated April 3, 2007, for the property located at <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH — SKETCH <br />t -Law appearing on behalf of Judson Dayton; Paul <br />Dayton, were present. <br />the applicant is proposing to combine the three <br />reate three new two plus acre building lots and one <br />ruse and horse barn. The four lots are proposed to be <br />o existing driveway accesses onto Old Crystal Bay <br />cels contains a cabin. The westerly of the smaller <br />it the lakeshore. <br />1 Bay and each exceeds two dry buildable acres in <br />s and at the 75 -foot lakeshore setback line. Lots 1, 3, <br />leaving a potential buildable width of 110 to 130 <br />sed to access Old Crystal Bay Road via proposed <br />a driveway that would also serve Lot 2. Lots 3 and 4 <br />�d via Outlot A, a proposed 30 foot corridor in which <br />Based on the definition of "back lot" and the standards of Section 82 -256, Lots 1, 3, and 4 would be <br />considered as back lots until or unless they abut an acceptable private or public road. The minimum <br />PAGE 11 of 22 <br />