Laserfiche WebLink
ivluv u i <br />ORONO CITY C <br />- <br />Monday, r <br />7:00 0 <br />( #07 -3250 Philip Carlson, Continued) <br />ES -OF THE <br />OUNCIL MEETING <br />larch 12, 2007 <br />clock p.m. <br />White inquired whether the retaining wall would be located on somebody else's property. <br />Shopek- stated the wall is located on the adjacent <br />that property owner and that the wall would be n <br />Gina Carlson noted they are replacing the railroad 1 <br />and would be upgrading the wall. <br />McMillan inquired whether the sidewalk located al <br />Shopek stated it would. <br />Kellogg commented he felt the 50 -foot recommendG <br />70 feet for a commercial road and 50 feet for a resid <br />proposing a 24 -foot roadway face to face and a 25 -f <br />back of curb. Kellogg noted the City would not hay <br />White noted this is not a full street and that the <br />compliance. <br />Gaffron stated the road would be privately plowed. <br />City Attorney Brokl suggested cross easements be <br />an easement in favor of the public. Brokl noted it i <br />be the responsibility of the property owners. <br />Bremer inquired how the City is able to ensure that <br />Brokl stated that would be one trade -off with the cr, <br />Bremer stated she would not prefer the roadway be <br />.ty but that they do have a signed easement with <br />ned by the Amber Woods association. <br />that are currently located on that person's property <br />Highway 12 would stay as is. <br />on was a compromise since the City's code requires <br />itial development. Kellogg stated the applicants are <br />A easement, which would cover the back of curb to <br />any rights to store snow along the roadway. <br />road would cause one of the units to be out of <br />)tained with the abutting property owners rather than <br />a private driveway and that the snow removal would <br />would be given to the City. <br />easements. <br />off to the public. <br />Shopek stated they possibly could do 30 feet, which may not be enough for snow storage. Shopek stated <br />it basically is a shared driveway among property o ers but other people would be able to drive through <br />the site. <br />White inquired whether the general public could drive through the site. <br />Brokl stated it would depend on the language. <br />Gaffron stated there was not an easement granted toithe public and that it was a cross easement in the <br />• prior application. Gaffron stated the intent for the future was to develop a quasi system of service roads <br />from essentially the Service 800 building to the senior housing site. <br />PAGE 9 of 19 <br />