Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 12, 2007 <br />• 7:00 o clock p.m. <br />( #06 -3238 Vogue ICF Homes, Continued) <br />White stated he reluctantly supports the motion. <br />after the project was red tagged even though they <br />being issued. <br />VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1, McMillan Opposed. <br />5.- #07 -3250 PHILIP CARLSON, 2060 WA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5585 <br />noted the structural plans were only provided <br />3 have been submitted prior to the building permit <br />.TA BOULEVARD WEST — PUD — <br />Gina Carlson and Philip Carlson, Applicants, and Jeff Shopek with Loucks and Associates, were present. <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting the fol <br />Jowing in order to construct ten units of office condos <br />on five lots and one common lot, to be known as Amber Woods Office Centre: <br />1. ..B -6 PUD General Concept Plan approval. <br />2. Preliminary Plat approval in order to create five unit lots and one common lot. <br />3. Commercial Site Plan approval in order to <br />4. Easement Vacations in conjunction with <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this at its Janu <br />voted 7 -0 to recommend approval, subject to a few <br />Gaffron'stated the following issues remain unresol <br />1. Retaining wall design. The issue of whethf <br />boulders is both an engineering concern and an aesl <br />Engineer have been discussing the engineering issu <br />located on the plan without affecting the adjoining, <br />boulder wall systems. <br />2. Access easements. The City's goal is that <br />property via vehicles, foot, etc., from the senior ho <br />and up through the applicants' parking lot to coma( <br />rear service road. This is not intended to be an out <br />boundaries that require setbacks. To that end, an e <br />rights, such as a condition of the PUD approval, is <br />extend over the entire parking lot system and drivi <br />adjoining properties. The City Engineer has sugge <br />building permits. <br />of new easements. <br />and February meetings, and on February 200', <br />itional conditions. <br />the retaining walls will be of Keystone block or <br />-tic question. The applicants' engineer and the City <br />which include the ability to construct walls as <br />operties to the north and east and stability of the <br />public have the right to traverse the applicants' <br />ng driveway directly across to the welding shop site <br />with Outlot D, Sugar Woods, the potential future <br />corridor, nor do we want to create new lot <br />=ent or some other method of establishing those <br />cessary. We would expect that this right would <br />lanes, as well as the connection points to the <br />d that the corridor across the front of the site should <br />PAGE 7 of 19 <br />