Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 12, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />3. #06 -3211 TED CAPRA, 3534 IVY PLACE - VARIANCE <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to table Application #06 -3211, Ted Capra, 3534 Ivy Place, at the <br />request of the Applicant. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />4. #06 -3238 VOGUE ICF HOMES, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE - REVIEW STATUS OF <br />REMODEL PROJECT <br />John Vogstrom, Vogue ICF Homes, was present. <br />Vogstrom addressed the City Council regarding the red tagging of the project located at 2709 Walters <br />Port Lane. Vogstrom stated one of the basic rules for the remodeling of a house is a sound foundation <br />and that they were not aware of the deteriorating condition of the foundation underneath the garage until <br />they removed some of the wood paneling on the wall. Vogstrom stated he immediately called the City <br />and notified them of the problem and he also called his structural engineer to gain his input. Vogstrom <br />stated his structural engineer felt that that portion of the foundation should be dug out and replaced due to <br />the problems they encountered with the frost. The homeowners were also contacted and they informed <br />him that the wall had been reconstructed approximately ten years ago, in 1995. The homeowners • <br />purchased the home in 1984, with the home originally being constructed in 1955 or thereabouts. <br />Vogstrom stated it was not until the brick veneer was removed that the problem was noticed and that they <br />commenced digging down around the foundation. Vogstrom stated there was one footing that was <br />located 12 inches below the ground, which explained why the wall deteriorated over the years. The <br />structural engineer's recommendation was to dig out that portion of the wall, redo the footings, and then <br />construct a new foundation in that area. Vogstrom stated he did have a footing inspection scheduled prior <br />to the footings being poured. <br />Vogstrom stated in his opinion he did what he should have done to ensure the project was done correctly <br />and constructed on a good foundation. <br />Vogstrom stated the plan that was approved by the City does depict a higher wall across the back and that <br />the way the wall was constructed is what the City approved. Vogstrom stated they utilized all the existing <br />walls in the basement and that he only removed one corner where there was no frost protection. Frost <br />protection was put in that area to help preserve the foundation. Vogstrom indicated it was his intent and <br />still is his intent to construct the house as approved by the City and that the extra work that was <br />completed was not anticipated. <br />Vogstrom stated there were also some mold problems in the house as a result of improper flashing and <br />lack of drain tile. Vogstrom stated the jack hammering of the floor was done to help eliminate the mold <br />and was a cheaper method of correcting the problem. <br />Vogstrom stated they would like to continue with the project. <br />• <br />PAGE 2 of 19 <br />