Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 12, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(5. #06 -3240 CITY OF ORONO ZONING CODE SECTION 78 -I — DEFINITIONS OF • <br />`BASEMENT "AND "STORY'; Continued) <br />White thanked Mr. Schoenzeit for providing his input and that the Council and Staff would take his <br />suggestions into consideration. <br />Schoenzeit commended the Staff on the City's website. <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 37, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending Chapter 78 of the Orono Municipal Code by Amending Section 78 -1: Definitions <br />Related to Determinations of Basements and Stories. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*6. #06 -3242 YUNKER ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF DAVID AND BETSY <br />WYERHAEUSER,1540 FOX STREET — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLUTION NO. <br />5575 <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5575, a Resolution granting a <br />conditional use permit for the property located at 1540 Fox Street. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />*7. #07 -3253 JENNIFER AND CHARLIE COGBILL,1590 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD — <br />VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5576 <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5576, a Resolution granting a <br />side -yard setback variance for the property located at 1590 Long Lake Boulevard. VOTE: Ayes 4, • <br />Nays 0. <br />8. #07 -3260 ROGER O'SHAUGHNESSY,1265 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - VARIANCE <br />Susan Steinwall, Attorney- at- Law,'appeared on behalf of Roger O'Shaughnessy. <br />Murphy inquired what impact this application would have on County Road 6. <br />Gaffron stated if Council approves the application, Staff would prepare findings that would set forth that <br />this property is a unique situation and that the fence is very opaque and of a light color. Gaffron stated <br />the City's fence ordinance can be interpreted differently and that perhaps the language should be amended <br />slightly in the future. <br />McMillan noted this is a lakeshore lot, which helps make it a unique situation. <br />Bremer inquired whether any of the fence is located within the 75 foot setback. <br />Gaffron stated the fence does not extend into the 75 -foot setback <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution for Application <br />#07 -3260, Roger O'Shaughnessy,1265 Bracketts Point Road, based on the findings that this is a <br />lakeshore lot abutting a major thoroughfare, the fence is less than 25 percent opaque, is five feet tall <br />rather than the allowed six feet, and has adequate landscaping or screening around the fence. <br />PAGE 10 of 14 <br />