01-22-2007 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, January 22, 2007 7:00 o?clock p.m. (5. #07 -3257 BPS PROPERTIES, 95 LEAF area. Stickney stated they are planning for a net in with the development. Stickney stated under the revised plan the smallest consist of 2.89 acres; and the average size of the to buildable. Stickney stated the average street front, approximately 7.37 acres, which would be restrict( Numerous test sites have been conducted on the should be able to have its own septic and well. ; Continued) of approximately 100 trees once they are done t would consist of 1.66 acres, the largest lot would in the development would be 2.10 acres dry setback is 210 feet. The conservation area is with no cut zones and no build zones. which have demonstrated that each lot Stickney stated the length of the roadway would be 1365 feet. Stickney noted that there are other roads within the City that are longer in length than what is being proposed for this area. White inquired whether the road would be Kellogg indicated he would defer to the fire marsha anything problematic based on what has been done stormwater ponds, there would probably be a need i White noted Staff feels there should be a through cc Gaffron stated the advantage of providing for the co eliminate the need for the City to purchase property have a considerable number of streets similar to this would be 28 feet. McMillan inquired whether there is development to Gaffron stated that it was the intent to provide a cor would become developed further. McMillan commented it appears the parcel north of this development. Stickney stated High Lane would have sufficient fri Gaffron stated if the cul -de -sac at the north end abu into. Stickney stated that is one option and that another o slightly along the frontage. Murphy commented there are a lot of attractive eler efforts of the developer to try to preserve as many c developer feels about doing the conservation areas s development. Murphy noted that there are five lots for fire protection. on the width of the roadway but that he does not see i the past. Kellogg stated based on the two ir curb and gutter. to Watertown Road. nnection would be for future development and would" in the future. Gaffron noted the City currently does roadway. Gaffron stated the standard road width the west that is anticipated. connection to the east in the event this area the Luce Line could become partially landlocked with to provide that connection. enough of that property, it could possibly be teed would be to create one more lot and angling it ;nts to this development and that he appreciates the the trees as possible. Murphy inquired how the A whether 15 lots are necessary for this zat are less than the two -acre requirement. PAGE 3 of 13