My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-2008 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
12-08-2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:18:34 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 1:28:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 8, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />5. #08 -3388 BOYER BUILDERS ONBEHALF OFMATTHEWAND AMYHERMAN, 3825 <br />CHERRYA VENUE, Continued <br />Turner stated Smyth is recommending 10 feet. <br />McMillan asked whether anything would trigger the east wetland buffer given the location of the addition <br />being located more on the west side. <br />Turner stated the wetland buffer is'triggered for a number of reasons. In this situation it is not, mainly <br />because the addition is split between two wetlands and each buffer requirement is triggered separately. <br />Turner indicated less excavating is required given the fact that the house needs to be raised 18 inches. <br />Rahn commented the proposed addition and house are not that large and concurred that it would not be <br />possible to relocate the addition in a better location. <br />Turner stated the buffer of 16.5 feet is more of the absorption area and the 20 -foot buffer setback is <br />considered more of a firebreak and also provides for some separation from the actual wetland buffer. <br />• <br />Carl Smith, Boyer Builders, stated it was difficult to locate the addition given the building setbacks and <br />the lake setback. Following subsequent surveys, it was discovered there was a wetland on the west side <br />as well, which impacted their plan. They attempted to reconfigure the plan to try to mitigate the amount <br />of soil disturbance, to avoid the setback buffer, and to minimize the footprint of the addition as much as <br />possible. Smith commented this was a difficult lot to work with. • <br />McMillan asked whether the applicant is okay with the improved buffer. <br />Amy Herman stated she is. <br />Rahn asked whether she is also okay with removing the shed. <br />Amy Herman stated they would remove the shed. <br />White commented this lot is similar to a Lakeshore lot and concurred that this is a difficult lot to work <br />with. White stated the City has to be strict with hardcover, particularly on a lakeshore lot, to help protect <br />the lake and wetlands. <br />Murphy stated in this type of situation as it relates to the driveway, he would like the applicants to <br />consider utilizing a pervious mixture of materials to help with the runoff. <br />Rahn moved, Murphy seconded, Application #08 -3388, Boyer Builders on behalf of Matthew and <br />Amy Herman, 3825, Cherry Avenue, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution requiring <br />removal of the shed, a maximum hardcover of 28.4 percent, and consistent with the <br />recommendations of Staff and John Smyth, wetland consultant. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />• <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.