My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/2008 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2008
>
11/10/2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:18:21 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 1:27:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 10, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. #08 -3381 BARRY TANNER, 3435 SHORELINE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Rahn stated he would like to see a professionally drawn site plan, a list of the proposed <br />improvements that will be made, a decision on whether the area on top should be paved or not <br />paved, an accurate depiction of the parking stalls, and an architecturally drawn floor plan of the <br />interior of the building. Rahn noted a lighting plan, signage, and elevation plan was requested by <br />the Planning Commission. _ <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />5. #08 -3384 CITY OF ORONO — ACCESSORY STRUCTURE CODE CHANGE <br />Rahn stated in his opinion the zoning code amendment reads fine but that incorporation of <br />windows in the structure should not be mandated since a number of people do not want windows <br />in their accessory buildings due to security reasons. Rahn stated as long as the exterior fagade is <br />the same or similar, he does not feel windows should be required. <br />Murphy stated his barn is approximately 60 years and his house is approximately 25 years, but <br />that he would not want his barn to look like his house but rather look like a barn. <br />Turner noted his property would be exempt since it is four acres in size and that this code change <br />would only apply to lots less than two acres. <br />• <br />Gaffron noted on lots less than two acres, you would only be allowed a structure that is 1,000 • <br />square feet or less. <br />Turner stated similar quality exterior building materials as the house would be required on the <br />accessory building. <br />Rahn noted given the size of the lots, only a smaller size structure could be constructed. <br />McMillan commented this code amendment is probably the closest the council has come mi <br />creating an ordinance regulating the appearance of a building. <br />Rahn noted anything over 120 square feet would be considered an accessory structure. <br />Turner stated the second part of this code change would only apply to detached garages that are <br />built on lakeshore lots, are built within the front yard, and are less than 30 or 50 feet from the <br />road. <br />McMillan asked what the 120 square feet is based on. <br />Turner stated that is the point at which a building permit is not required. <br />Gaffron stated in one of the earlier versions the language talked about being consistent with the <br />principal structure and that it has been changed to same or similar quality materials to the <br />principal structure, which has a different meaning. Gaffron stated being consistent to the <br />principal structure means more to him than similar quality materials. • <br />Page 8of13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.