Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />• <br />• <br />ORONO CITY ( <br />Monday, Nc <br />7:00 o <br />(4. #08 -3381 BARRY TANNER, 3435 <br />McMillan stated the Council is attempting to <br />the building or whether the applicant is just € <br />OF THE <br />FNCIL MEETING <br />aber 10, 2008 <br />ek p.m. <br />DRIVE, Continued) <br />a feel for what improvements will be made to <br />to do the bare minimum to get the place open. <br />Tanner stated he has spent over a year of his time on his application, that he is committed to the <br />project, and that he plans to invest over $100,000 in the project. <br />Bremer commented in her view there appears <br />like to see required and what Staff is requiring <br />information submitted by this point. <br />Turner stated Staff is looking for the floor pl <br />indicated the site plan is based on a survey tl <br />that the applicant could go back to that surv( <br />Turner stated there are some broad issues ab <br />paved as well as the lighting that should be c <br />44 spaces would be adequate, and if not, the <br />noted there is shortage of approximately 10 <br />in this case. In addition, Staff is looking for <br />her understanding that the lighting situation <br />in the parking lot. <br />Bremer asked whether the City Council <br />approved tonight. <br />Turner stated the Council would look at it at <br />approval process. <br />be a disconnect between what the Council would <br />Bremer stated she expected to see detailed <br />ti so they can judge the amount of seating. Turner <br />Lt was completed as part of a previous proposal and <br />or and have him draw the plan more formally. <br />ut parking spaces and when they would need to be <br />scussed further. The Planning Commission felt that <br />pper area would need to be blacktopped. Turner <br />{ 12 parking stalls from what the code would require <br />�ditional detail on the lighting issues and that it is <br />came worse after a new light fixture was installed <br />il <br />Bremer stated if this was a new building that 1 <br />reviewed every aspect of the project and have <br />and exterior. Bremer asked whether a conditi <br />ability to require that thorough of a review. B <br />that there would be further details provided bj <br />Tanner noted he did spend time at two <br />Commission. <br />Bremer stated she is not saying that any of 1 <br />that in her opinion the Council should have <br />this stage. <br />be reviewing this application again if it was <br />next city council meeting as part of the resolution <br />being proposed, the Council would have <br />uired very detailed information on the interior <br />I use permit application gives Council that same <br />ier stated in her view she had the understanding <br />this point in time. <br />igs discussing this application with the Planning <br />1 <br />-'time spent by the applicant has been wasted, but <br />tore detailed information on the project to review by <br />White commented one of the missing pieces i <br />present at the meeting and that the owner has <br />White stated in his view the applicant will net <br />other outstanding issues. <br />this application is the owner of the building is not <br />t be responsible to the City as well as the tenants. <br />. to supply detailed information on the parking and <br />Tanner stated the owner of the property resides in California and that there is a property manager <br />that takes care of the property. Tanner stated to date the owner has done the things that have been <br />Page 5 of 13 <br />