Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 13, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(4. #08 -3367 TOM & PATTYKUBALAK, 2623 CASCO POINT ROAD, Continued) <br />2. To add and remove hardcover within the 75 -250 foot zone resulting in 41.6 percent hardcover <br />when 49.7 percent exists and the maximum allowed is 25 percent. <br />To change the shape of the roof over the portion of the house that is within the 10 -foot setback <br />from the north property line. <br />4. To add a roof and screen walls to a 4 x 6 foot portion of the deck that is within the 10 -foot <br />setback from the north property line. <br />The Planning Commission voted 4 to 2 to recommend approval of the variances. <br />Planning Staff would recommend approval of the variances with incorporation of a rain garden and/or <br />impervious paving materials once the grading issues have been resolved. <br />Turner displayed the proposed layout of the house on the lot. Turner noted the applicants are proposing <br />3 -foot wide steps and a 16 -foot wide driveway down to the street without a turn- around. <br />Kubalak stated they had initially purchased the house with the intent of remodeling, but that due to a <br />number of nonconformities and safety issues, they felt it would be better to construct a new residence. <br />Kubalak pointed out areas of poly and rock that would be eliminated as well as some concrete areas they <br />would be willing to remove. Kubalak stated they would also be willing to eliminate a flight of steps <br />going down to the lake and that the slab in the back is for a patio. In addition, they have reduced the • <br />driveway to 16 feet in width. <br />Kubalak stated there are some hardships associated with the property, including "safety issues in <br />accessing the road given the current location of the garage. The neighbors are in support of the project <br />and overall the project complements the neighborhood and improves the drainage on the lot. <br />McMillan noted the minutes reflect that the applicant indicated at the Planning Commission meeting <br />that the house is in a deteriorated condition and asked whether steps are being taken to shore up the <br />structure. <br />Kubalak stated they would reduce it down to the foundation and build it back up. Kubalak pointed out <br />the current foundation has to be replaced as well but that they would be keeping the same footprint. <br />Patty Kubalak stated the original house was destroyed in a tornado in 1965 and that they were led to <br />believe that it was a completely brand -new house but that it was actually built on the original <br />foundation. <br />Turner stated the state statute would allow them to replace what currently exists. <br />Rahn stated it is his understanding that the state statute would not allow them to increase the height of <br />the structure. <br />Turner stated Orono Code would allow them to add a second story and to correct nonconformities as <br />long as they comply with setbacks. • <br />PAGE 4 of 11 <br />