Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />"'ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 22, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(4. #08 -3370 BARB AND %EVINDULIN WITH J. SVEN GUSTAFSON OF STONEWOOD, <br />LLC, 1785 CONCORDIA STREET, Continued) <br />Dulin stated they would be required to replace the floodplain somewhere else on the lot. <br />Alexander stated the surveyor has done those calculations. <br />Turner noted the applicants are cutting a swale on the north lot line, which in the city engineer's view <br />should help with the drainage. <br />Rahn asked what type of pool is being proposed. . <br />Dulin stated the proposed pool is a four -foot deep lap pool and is designed for therapeutic purposes. <br />Dulin stated if this application is not approved, he would be requesting a permit to redo the siding of the <br />house and otherwise fix it up to sell it. Dulin asked whether that would trip the floodplain regulations. <br />Turner indicated replacing siding and windows does not trip the floodplain regulations. <br />Murphy stated he has reviewed the minutes and the original proposal and- that he believes the applicants <br />have done an extraordinary amount of work to address the issues raised by the Council. Murphy stated <br />he would require full approval by the City Engineer but that this proposal would vastly improve the <br />property. Murphy stated if the pool could be moved further to give more access on that side of the <br />property, he would be in favor of the proposal. <br />Bremer stated she personally does not prioritize the same way the applicant does but that Council <br />Member Murphy has made a good point. Bremer stated if the applicant had been requesting a third stall <br />on the garage, that probably would not have raised as much concern as a pool and that she has to step <br />back from the concept that it is a pool rather than a third garage stall. Bremer stated in her view there is <br />a hardship to the lot but that she is unsure what the hardcover number should be. Bremer indicated she <br />would have preferred to see a hardcover number below 27 percent and that in her view the deck could <br />be reduced slightly. <br />Alexander stated it is approximately 12 x 30 and that 12 feet is required to arrange furniture. <br />Dulin stated they are approximately 628 feet over and that the porch is not that much. <br />Rahn stated he personally feels there should be a further reduction in hardcover and that he does not <br />particularly care where the reduction is made. <br />Bremer stated there are plenty of homes that have been designed with porches or decks that don't extend <br />the length of the house to help meet the hardcover limits and that she fundamentally has a problem with <br />approving the variance in excess of 27 percent given the size of the lot. <br />Gustafson noted the sewer line does constitute a hardship and results in approximately 1,000 square feet <br />in hardcover, which does not seem to be given much consideration. <br />Bremer commented the hardship should justify the hardcover in excess of 25 percent. <br />• <br />PAGE 10 of 18 <br />