My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
07-11-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 12:13:33 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 12:12:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />7;00 o'clock p.m. <br />7. LURTON PARK (continued) <br />Barnhart stated he has noticed that there are some park users utilizing the park in an ort -leash area and <br />that in Staffs view the variance is the minimal amount necessary to allow use by the public. <br />Barnhart noted the Park Commission recommends approval of the plan, while the Planning Commission <br />recommended denial of the variance. <br />Walsh asked how the fence will work. Walsh stated it appears the fence will be stretched and in a straight <br />line as much as possible. Walsh asked whether it will be necessary to cut swaths to erect the fence. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Edwards stated the goal is to make as many straight lines as <br />possible with the fence since any corners will add expense to the project. <br />Walsh asked whether a swath will need to be cut. <br />Edwards stated most fence contractors did say they could minimize the swath but that some areas will <br />need to be cut so they can get access to the fence locations with something the size of a Gator or a skid <br />steer in order to bring in materials. <br />Walsh stated he wanted to make sure they are not going to cut an 8 or 10 -foot path. <br />Edwards stated the goal is to maintain as much vegetation as possible. Edwards stated as it relates to <br />Design No. 3, it has been overlaid with the current trail network, which is the reason for the location of <br />the northern path. The orange line marks the woodchip trail, which will also provide access for installing <br />the fence as well. The green line depicts a pretty well defined dirt trail and the red trail is a fairly well <br />defined dirt trail. Edwards stated the other trails seem to be seasonal. During the Planning Commission <br />meeting, there was some discussion about how someone could navigate the park without going inside the <br />dog area, and if some of those trails are improved, there would be that opportunity available. Edwards <br />noted the blue dots depict a gate. <br />Walsh commented the park is a great asset for the community and that he has met with some of the Park <br />Commissioners and walked through it with them as well as some of the neighbors. Walsh stated having <br />the ability to have input has made all the difference in the world and that he would liken it almost to the <br />Lakeview development and the public comment that was received on that application. Walsh commented <br />everyone has compromised a little to make it work and that in his view, after walking the park, it is a <br />great design. Walsh stated if he would make any changes to the plan, he would take the line and go from <br />the one dot right straight over to the other dot. Walsh stated 130 feet is pretty close to one of the <br />neighbor's house and that he would suggest straightening that line out rather than doing that little L or U. <br />Edwards noted the Park Commission opted for the more northerly route in an attempt to maximum the <br />wooded area for the off -leash area rather than a straight line between the two dots. <br />Rick Meyers, Park Commission Chair, stated they wanted the fence further north because it provided' <br />8.1 acres for the off -leash area and 7.87 acres for the on -leash dog park. Meyers stated the Park <br />Commission felt that was the best plan and that it would be up to the City Council if they want to change <br />it. The Park Commission was more concerned about putting the drinking fountain and the picnic tables <br />back in the plan. <br />Page 3 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.