My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
06-27-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2016 12:12:31 PM
Creation date
8/1/2016 12:11:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, dune 27, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />14. HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSING AGREEMENT <br />Loftus stated the City's agreement with Hennepin County to perform assessing services is set to expire <br />soon. In April of this year, the Council had a presentation from the Hennepin County Assessor's Office <br />as well as had an opportunity to discuss this at their May work session. <br />Loftus stated the item in front of the Council this evening for consideration is a 4 -year contract at a cost of <br />$172,000 for 2017. Staff recommends approval of the agreement. <br />Walsh stated the reason he took it off the Consent Agenda is that he does not see a reason to do more than <br />a 1 -year agreement with Hennepin County since a longer agreement would preclude the City from having <br />the opportunity to look at other vendors as they become available. Walsh stated this might be a really <br />good opportunity to look at other options and perhaps save some money. Walsh stated by entering into a <br />4 -year contract, the City precludes other options being pursued, and that there is no financial incentive for <br />the City to do more than one year at a time. <br />McMillan noted a representative from the Hennepin County Assessor's Office is not here to address this <br />tonight and that they do make investments in hiring assessing staff. <br />Loftus stated it is promising to have new businesses enter this field but that of the ones that exist right <br />now, she is not sure that a 1 -year track record would make her more comfortable to go with them. Loftus <br />indicated she would prefer over a two year track record. Loftus stated since the Council last met, she was <br />informed by the new company that they have secured a contract with the City of Greenwood, which <br />would provide Lake Minnetonka experience, and that perhaps Orono could look at contacting them a <br />couple of years down the road. <br />Levang stated she would like to go along with Staff's recommendation and that it is a good agreement and <br />a good department to be working with. Levang stated there are advantages to working with Hennepin <br />County and that the Council needs to be extremely careful about the people who enter Orono residents' <br />homes. Levang stated in a few years the City could take the time to look at something else or they can <br />put this out as an RFP. Levang stated since there is a cost associated with the RFP process, she would <br />rather not do that every year or two years and that perhaps it could be a 4 -year rotation. <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, to approve the Hennepin County Assessing Agreement. <br />McMillan stated when she became Mayor, she looked at a number of their assessments and they were <br />close to the market. McMillan stated the Hennepin County Assessor's Office provides a good service and <br />that they do have to hire people based on their agreements and that she would hate to check up on them <br />every year or leave them in limbo. McMillan stated in her view four years is okay for the term of the <br />agreement. <br />Printup asked if in the past it has been on a 4 -year rotation <br />Loftus indicated it has been. <br />Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.