Laserfiche WebLink
6N <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 28, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(3. #08 -3351 BARRY TANNER ON BEHALF OF BROOK INVESTMENT, B -1 ZONING <br />DISTRICT, Continued) <br />Murphy expressed some concerns regarding the creation of a commercial recreation ordinance and its <br />impact to the city. Murphy noted this process was started by the application of Mr. Tanner to open a <br />bowling center. Murphy commented the language in the ordinance is very broad and it may be unclear <br />exactly what will be allowed and what will not be allowed. <br />Murphy asked if the zoning code amendment would also be approved if the Council votes to adopt the <br />ordinance. <br />White and Gaffron stated it would be. <br />Gaffron noted the applicant would still need to go through the conditional use process that would deal <br />specifically with his site. <br />Murphy stated he would like the record to be clear that by passing this ordinance, it does not approve Mr. <br />Tanner's particular application concerning the bowling alley. Murphy asked whether Mr. Tanner would <br />be operating the bowling alley personally. <br />Tanner indicated that while he would be involved in the management of the business he would not be <br />there on a day -to -day basis and would rely on his employees in the operation of the facility. <br />Murphy asked what Mr. Tanner normally does. • <br />Tanner stated he is in the real estate business and is leasing the space necessary to operate the bowling <br />alley. <br />Bremer commented that in her opinion the ordinance is well drafted and includes the changes that she <br />thought were necessary. Bremer asked whether the applicant is clear that he still has to go through the <br />conditional use permit process. . <br />Tanner indicated he is aware of that requirement. <br />McMillan stated her initial concern was the impact on the parking and the noise that might be generated <br />from patrons coming and going from the facility. McMillan noted the B -1 zoning districts are small and <br />that the conditional use permit process will allow the City to place additional restrictions on the bowling <br />center and that the City could benefit from these types of recreational opportunities. <br />White stated as it relates to the ordinance, he shares some of Council Member Murphy's concerns, but <br />that the protections built into the ordinance appear adequate. White noted the City does not have large <br />sites available for commercial recreation, which will help control the types of commercial recreation that <br />would be able to operate in the City. <br />Bremer moved, McMillan seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 47, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending the Orono City Code to Provide for Commercial Recreation Uses in the B -1 Zoning <br />District. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 1, Murphy Opposed. <br />• <br />PAGE 2 of 7 <br />r <br />