Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY !COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2008 <br />• 7:00 I 'clock p.m. <br />• <br />• <br />(4. #03 -3351 BARRY TANNER ON BEHALF OF BROOK INVESTMENT, B -1 ZONING <br />DISTRICT — ZONING CODE AMENDMENT; Continued) <br />White commented that the main issue with this site is the fact that there needs to be a number of revenue <br />sources within the bowling center, such as food service, vending machines, and alcohol, which can <br />create problems. <br />Tanner noted bowling centers have operated <br />White stated one of the issues is the fact that <br />their rents will be tripled. White expressed c <br />enough income to be viable. <br />Tanner stated he does not own the building and <br />located in the basement. <br />way for over 50 years. <br />ants above the bowling center have been told that <br />that the bowling center will be able to generate <br />he is only the owner of the bowling center, which is <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, Application #08 -3351, Barry Tanner on behalf of Brook <br />Investment, B -1 Zoning District - Zoning Code Amendment, to direct staff to develop a code <br />amendment based on the memorandum received from the Planning Commission. <br />Murphy asked what the rationale is for <br />center in the B -1 District. <br />Turner stated the list was developed from su <br />places selected for the list were recreational. <br />Murphy stated he would like to understand the <br />White noted the B -1 zoning districts within the <br />a swimming school, a scuba school, and an events <br />from the Planning Commissioners and that the <br />for including some of these uses. <br />are very small and would not allow some of these <br />uses. <br />i <br />Gaffron indicated it was not the intent to expan d the B -1 districts and that due to the size of the <br />properties located in the B -1 districts, some of these uses would not be allowed. <br />Bremer stated if the City Attorney feels it is better to have a list developed, she would be in favor of a <br />list, but that she has found over the years people "s tastes change and recommended that if the district <br />cannot accommodate a certain use, it should be eliminated from the list. <br />McMillan asked whether wine could also be sold. <br />Bremer stated a liquor license would be requiredlto sell wine or beer stronger than 3.2 beer. <br />Turner stated if stronger beer or alcohol is <br />Murphy requested that Staff give some consider, <br />specific use that is listed as they draft the zoning <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Staff would like to see a larger food selection offered. <br />to the future advantages and disadvantages of each <br />amendment. <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />