My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2008 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
05-27-2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:17:05 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 1:17:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />n <br />U <br />i <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY !COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(PUBLIC COMMENTS, Continued) <br />amount of money on their application. After tl <br />charge of $1800, which they were unaware the <br />that Orono has a contract with Bonestroo, who <br />engineer would have the final say. <br />Feyo stated she spoke with Ron Moorse and as: <br />was told it is not charged on a regular basis. Fe <br />about the charge upfront. Feyo stated they had <br />indicating that a new survey was not necessary <br />told the City required another survey. Feyo sta <br />then contacted Bonestroo and asked why they i <br />was told that Bonestroo's accounting system w <br />Later someone at City Hall informed them that <br />aware that they should be charged. <br />Feyo commented in her view it was a <br />Feyo stated she was initially told by Planner <br />charge would apply but she was later told by <br />was made by Planner Turner. <br />Rahn stated the City would certainly be willing <br />Bremer stated generally there are some engine <br />once a certain amount is reached, there may be <br />on the amount of engineering services required. <br />Feyo indicated she can appreciate that but that <br />stated they do not feel the charge was fair and <br />The City Council took no formal action on this i <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />4. #03 -3351 BARRY TANNER ON <br />DISTRICT — ZONING CODE AMENDS <br />Barry Tanner, Applicant, was present. <br />Turner stated the applicant is requesting the B -1 <br />allow bowling centers as conditional uses. The <br />develop conditions and criteria for commercial i <br />the topic at its May 7a' work session and develol <br />Planning Commission at their May 19th meeting <br />variance was approved, they received from the City a <br />ould incur. Feyo indicated they had an understanding <br />s doing the consulting work, and that the City's <br />i whether everybody gets charged this extra fee. She <br />indicated she then asked why they were not told <br />ree previous surveys, with two of the surveyors <br />ice nothing had changed on the lot, but yet they were <br />I they did go ahead and obtain another survey. She <br />re not informed of this additional charge upfront and <br />in disarray and they were not aware of the charge. <br />D City of Orono's books were in disarray and were not <br />and that the charge should be dropped. <br />'r that the City Engineer determines whether the <br />Engineer Kellogg that the decision to charge the fee <br />look into this issue further and get back to Mrs. Feyo. <br />costs that are included in the application fee but that <br />.ional charges assessed and the charge is dependent <br />had very little control over the situation. Feyo <br />:sted the council look into the matter. <br />OF BROOK INVESTMENT, B -1 ZONING <br />ail sales business district regulations be amended to <br />mcil had requested that the Planning Commission <br />elation uses. The Planning Commission discussed <br />some criteria. The criteria were approved by the <br />PAGE 5 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.