Laserfiche WebLink
"r <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />2008 LOCAL BOARD OF <br />Wednesd; <br />7:00 <br />has 45 feet of shoreline and her property on the <br />Oliverius land is $640,000. <br />To the west of his property, the properties be( <br />Judy's properties are pie- shaped.. The square <br />the length of the property dramatically increa <br />for land value. <br />Bernard stated the main difference between the <br />they are pie shaped. The reason for the pie sha] <br />in Judy's dock and his dock virtually touching i <br />undesirable feature. Bernard indicated neither <br />the limited space because it would encroach on <br />to protrude further out on the other lots. <br />Bremer stated those lots are also bigger, which <br />Bernard stated the length of a dock is limited to <br />McMillan pointed out the LMCD concurs that 1 <br />Rahn asked whether there is a difference in the <br />Bernard stated the structures range from new to <br />of land value. Bernard stated if the $550,000 ni <br />decrease by $58,000 and for Judy's property it <br />McMillan noted these two lots do have more <br />Rahn stated some of these issues are difficult to <br />Oliverius stated in her opinion it is a fairness <br />Davy stated he did drive by the property and tl <br />to account for the shape of the lot but does not <br />typically issues relating to shallow water, local <br />�6 _ i <br />'PEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />April 16, 2008 , <br />lock p.m. <br />end is 100 feet wide. The market value of the <br />:50-foot rectangular lots, where his property and <br />age also increases to the west for each lot because <br />The majority of those lots are assessed at $500,000 <br />two properties and their neighbors' properties is that <br />is the natural configuration of the lake, which results <br />.e another if they are extended out, which is an <br />operty can have anything but a dock and a boat due to <br />ie five foot setback. Bernard stated the docks are able <br />for a larger dock. <br />60 feet. <br />shaped lots are more limited in dock length. <br />residences. Bernard indicated he is speaking only <br />-r was applied to his lot, his valuation would <br />A decrease it by $90,000. <br />footage. <br />into the valuations. <br />the Assessor's Office does try to make adjustments <br />:e into account issues relating to docks. Davy stated <br />i, and size would be taken into consideration. <br />Bernard noted both of their residences meet the City's setback requirements, but there are two brand - <br />new houses within the past five years that have been constructed, which are much nicer than his <br />residence, that have been granted variances. <br />Davy stated the Assessor's Office would review the land values in that area. <br />8. Rob Weins, 1425 Bay Ridge Road, PID #10- 117 -23 34 0017 <br />Weins stated he resides on the corner of two busy roads, County Road 15 and 51, and he would <br />request that his land value be appraised the same as other comparable lots located on two busy roads. <br />PAGE 5 of 18 <br />