Laserfiche WebLink
'M <br />• <br />• <br />C] <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />7: 00! o'clock p.m. <br />(5. #08 -3344 CITY OF ORONO, BIG ISLAND PARK PROPERTY, Continued) <br />Mattick stated the City Council can direct Staff to prepare an approval resolution and that all the <br />requirements of the City have been met. <br />Bremer noted she was in attendance at the PI <br />the Planning Commission had a good discus: <br />concern expressed about the impact that four <br />clear from the information given to the Plann <br />of docks and that the Planning Commission <br />"I think it is a good idea to approve half and <br />be built." Bremer stated in her view the Plan <br />issues involved in an application. <br />Bremer suggested a joint meeting with the City <br />beneficial and recommended that a representatil <br />In essence, the Planning Commission relies on t <br />discussed and reviewed and that in her view the <br />Bremer noted that whenever the City is the app] <br />and given the go -ahead to Staff to file an applic, <br />Kempf stated the situation was rather unusual s <br />understanding the issues were up for discussion <br />was submitted kind of on the fly given the lack <br />felt they did not have enough information to be <br />impact the island. <br />Kempf commented he would like to see the Mii <br />Commission had concerns and uncertainty aboi <br />the impact that four docks would have on the is <br />meeting raised concerns regarding the wake fro <br />questions the need for four 100 foot docks with <br />would give as the entrance place to the island. <br />ing Commission meeting and that in her view she felt <br />regarding the application and that there was some <br />:ks would have the island. Bremer stated it was not <br />Commission that they were not to review the number <br />received comment from Mike Gaffron to the effect that <br />L get the second public hearing before allowing others to <br />Commission relies on Staff to focus them on the <br />)uncil and the Big Island Committee would be <br />from the Planning Commission be invited to attend. <br />direction of staff to know what issues need to be <br />ommissioners asked a number of good questions. <br />int, the City Council has already reviewed the work <br />ce it was coming from the City and that it was his <br />Kempf stated it appeared to him that the application <br />'survey information and that the Planning Commission <br />;sured that the proposed work would not negatively <br />iehaha dock at Big Island but that the Planning <br />what the future use of the island was going to be and <br />nd. Kempf noted the resident in attendance at the <br />. large boats and erosion and that he personally still <br />oncrete pads on Big Island and the impression that it <br />Murphy stated information needs to be transmitted better from the committee to staff and then to the <br />Planning Commission. Murphy noted that thereare issues dealing with timing of the work that have <br />been discussed thoroughly by the committee and that the work needs to be completed in the very near <br />future to avoid additional costs. <br />Jabbour stated the Planning Commission does not have the authority to limit the number of docks and <br />that the LMCD regulates the number of docks. Jabbour recommended the hierarchy of the different <br />organizations be explained to the Planning Commission. Jabbour asked whether the only issue that was <br />for review by the Planning Commission was the'lconstruction of the concrete pads. <br />Gaffron stated it was clear from Staff's memo <br />docks became a factor in determining how mu <br />it the variances had to do with the concrete pads. The <br />hardcover was appropriate. <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />