Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />• <br />• <br />i <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />7:00'! 'clock p.m. <br />(4. #08 -3340 MARK AND JENNIFER PRUETER, 3215 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD, Continued) <br />Murphy stated what he understands the applic <br />some additions to it, which will help improve <br />in favor of the box bay. <br />it is doing is re- siding the whole home and creating <br />U appearance of the residence. Murphy indicated he is <br />Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, to direc <br />No. 08 -3340, Mark and Jennifer Prueter, 321; <br />lakeshore setback and structural coverage va . <br />the addition of the box bay to the house but n <br />pergola over the existing deck. VOTE: Ayes <br />5. #08 -3344 CITY OF ORONO, BIG IS <br />VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF D <br />Gaffron stated the City of Orono is requesting v <br />dock gangway landing pads adjacent to the show <br />is to provide a suitable permanent landing area <br />will discharge passengers. The concrete pads v <br />attachment of the gangway to the pads. The do <br />be removed during the winter season. This prof <br />connecting the four pads, as well as rip- rapping <br />potential for erosion and undermining of the pay <br />Staff to draft a resolution approving Application <br />Crystal Bay Road, granting of an average <br />iances for the entryway as proposed, and approving <br />t a setback variance, and to deny the addition of a <br />y Nays 0. <br />) PARK PROPERTY, 100 BIG ISLAND — <br />LANDINGS <br />riance approvals to construct four 10' x 20' concrete <br />line at the City's Big Island Park property. The intent <br />here the gangways from the proposed floating docks <br />11 also incorporate hardware necessary for the <br />is are intended to be seasonal floating docks and will <br />ct also includes a series of 4' to 6' sidewalks <br />he shoreline in the area of the pads to eliminate the <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their February 19'' meeting. One resident was in <br />attendance for this application and expressed some concerns regarding the level of proposed activity at <br />the island, security issues, and erosion concems.1 The Planning Commission voted 7 -0 to approve <br />construction of two of the four pads (with docks; etc.) subject to the six conditions suggested in the staff <br />memo. The Planning Commission felt it was critical to obtain survey data before final approval is <br />granted to determine whether there will be filling within the floodplain that would need to be mitigated. <br />The Planning Commission decided that it was not necessary to slope the pads backward for runoff <br />discharge to a grassy swale or another storm water treatment facility and felt that filtration through the <br />rip -rap will adequately function to treat the runoff from the pads. <br />Gaffron noted the City Engineer has been <br />determine whether the proposed work will <br />completed this week. <br />It was the feeling of the Planning Commission <br />pursued, it would require an additional public ] <br />how the park is operating prior to expansion. <br />Gaffron stated the pads consist of approximat <br />if necessary. The amount of hardcover being <br />one percent. <br />sted to provide survey work as soon as possible to <br />re floodplain mitigation and that the work should be <br />if construction of the two additional pads were <br />ng and an opportunity for additional public input into <br />+1 1400 square feet and could be reduced to some extent <br />oposed for the 0 -75 foot zone consists of one quarter of <br />is Gabriel Jabbour addressed the City Council regarding the proposed work on Big Island and noted that <br />the committee's desire is to have various improvements to the island gradually evolve over time rather <br />PAGE 5 of 12 <br />1 <br />