My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2008 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
02-25-2008 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2012 2:16:10 PM
Creation date
7/23/2012 1:10:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TAE <br />ORONO CITYI,COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />7:00Io'clock p.m. <br />(4. #08 -3340 MARK AND JENNIFER PRUETER, 3215 CRYSTAL BAYROAD, Continued) <br />Prueter indicated it would basically be an open pergola but in his opinion would provide adequate <br />shading due to the angle of the sun. The intent of the box bay is to allow for a gas or propane fireplace <br />and eliminate their current chimney, which tends to allow cold air into the house. Prueter noted the area <br />is only 24 feet wide in that area and that by constructing the box bay, it would allow them to maintain <br />the majority of the space. I I <br />White noted his heating bills were reduced folio ng the installation of his box bay. <br />Rahn asked whether there are any other reductions in hardcover being proposed besides removal of the <br />poly to compensate for the added structural coverage. <br />Turner stated the applicant was directed to reduce the hardcover down to the original number and that <br />the added structural coverage would be going over existing hardcover. <br />Rahn commented in his view there should be additional reductions in hardcover to offset the increase in <br />structural coverage. <br />Prueter indicated he did submit a proposal to remove close to 700 square feet of hardcover. The <br />majority of it comes from the removal of poly and rock, but some decorative rock and a flagstone <br />retaining wall would also be removed as well as a concrete pad. <br />• Rahn asked whether the driveway would be narrowed. <br />Prueter indicated the width of the driveway would stay the same. Prueter indicated they would also be <br />willing to remove some stone planters. <br />Rahn stated it appears the applicant's property already protrudes further toward the lake than the <br />neighbors, and with the addition of the two -story entry, the massing on the lot will increase. Rahn <br />indicated he is unclear why the entryway needs to be two stories tall. <br />Prueter stated at the time they purchased the home, the deck was encroaching 14 to 15 feet, and at the <br />time they renovated in 1993, the deck was reduced. The structural design of the pergola is to remain <br />open and allow some light through it without prohibiting the neighbors' view of the lake. Prueter <br />indicated he does have some pictures which show the view of his yard from the neighbors. Prueter <br />stated the design of the entryway complements the house and would allow them some room in an <br />entryway that is very crowded at the present time. <br />Rahn stated given the limited amount of reductions in the hardcover and the potential impact on the <br />neighbors' views, he has a difficult time approvi I ng the variances. <br />Prueter distributed some photographs to the City Council illustrating different views from the <br />neighbors' property. Prueter noted one of his neighbors does have a guest house, which is located <br />closer to the lake than what they are proposing. <br />• Rahn asked whether the encroachment would create a new average lakeshore setback. <br />PAGE 3 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.