My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 2:13:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2012 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• . � <br /> ' PC Exhibit B <br /> . �� <br /> �� Page 1 of 3 <br /> � <br /> HARDSHIP DOCUM ENTATION FORM <br /> This form is a required submittal forALL variance applications. An application <br /> will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br /> complete and submitted to the City. � . <br /> � . <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a Hardship be <br /> demonstrated in order for a variance to be�granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br /> property as variances run.with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic <br /> situations are nof considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by <br /> � the . Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br /> demonstrated. . � <br /> . � . <br /> , HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP�? �� . <br /> � This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship � � <br /> exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br /> address all the relevant points listed below�and answer them as clearly as possible. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the � <br /> variance is justified. The information the_City receives is what is used in determining a <br /> denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> �« <br /> Please address each of these hardship criferia as they relate to the request (some may <br /> • not apply): � . � � <br /> � <br /> 1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls." <br /> �t � <br /> c. O T1 .-.�� '�`-+o.'y� �� o-� c.�' v]er1�a�.c.� �rr..� 'r'�..L <br /> F�r-c.J,- �- .�.at sikb-..,rs_ l.c �Z1.-�;c-. ti=4t �.k �-. "- ar ,-�c+�.c <br /> '?^--� �'L:..,� C.(ol c/ 'fi(�tA T I..e_ ���-st � ,f c l Z� n.) <br /> ` <br /> . :i . <br /> 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br /> created by the landowner.° ' � <br /> �l�-,� ��c.a c� o-..�.� -�o r �Z a cr'� � o k� }, ,r � <br /> � v�e.. �c �.- �.� <br /> ` �.-e- �.�x �. ..� Z z cr-�s, :y .a a't �..�� -rl..� c�,��.1 <br /> • h 4'+��e .S G -1 ��f t. �C �=�' n t-� C!(,�k'L '�{.t a�•/�' G� �2 f i'1 n(,� <br /> � <br /> s+•i:,n. <br /> 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." <br /> f`� tb ia' tr.ii��` i iw,Pf'e •c, �1.-c �...Gq��'.1 e�.a�1 <br /> , � _ <br /> a <br /> 4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br /> •; <br /> ,, <br /> u . <br /> i <br /> ,� <br /> . ; <br /> . � �. � Y �SQV, 4'M���.' i l� . 'y <br /> ,.'�b w.w.+� yltit '•'Y,i,.,� Ii�v.' . <br /> t <br /> t� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.