Laserfiche WebLink
, , <br /> ��� G <br /> . � <br /> . , . <br /> � <br /> Memorandum � �Bonestroo <br /> ., <br /> � <br /> 2335 Highway 36 W <br /> To: Tom Kellogg Project: 774 Tonkawa Rd. II Date: 6-27-07 St.Paul,MN 55113 <br /> From; Lance Hoff Client: Clty Of OfonO II Tel 651-636•4600 <br /> Fax 651-636-1311 <br /> Re: Drainage Review . File1�No: 139Gen www.bonestroo.com <br /> As requested,we've review the site against the requirements.and Iltandards of the City of Orono. Detaiis <br /> follow below: � � <br /> . . � . <br /> � We based our review on a site visit with Dan Hessberg(o, ner)and Peter Knaeble(engineer <br /> w/Terra)and the following information: �I ' <br /> o Plan sheet showing draintile system layout and typical cross-section(provided by the <br /> landscaper?). � <br /> o Drainage calculations provided by the owner's e�ngineer. <br /> o As-built survey provided by the owner s surveyo�(Demars-Gabriel). <br /> , <br /> � • As-built information for the draintile system was not provided. However,the system did match the <br /> • provided plan sheet per my inspection with the exceptior�that the northeast pop-up could not be . <br /> located. The northeast pop-up should be located and documented(pictures taken relative to the <br /> - home and adjacent retaining wall—submitted to the Ciry). Also,to function properly the system <br /> should be laid as flat as possible. The two draintile systems(located to the north and south of the <br /> house)are both located in relatively flat areas and should function properly. <br /> • A rule-of-thumb that is applicable when utilizing subsurface storage was used to check fhe <br /> adequacy of the draintile system. To meet 2-, 10-, and 100-yr peak flows and water quality <br /> requirements;the difference in runoff volume between the 2 areas of comparison(typically existing <br /> �and proposed conditions)during a 2-yr storm must be p�ovided in the subsurface storage. For this <br /> site,the areas for comparison are the approved impervious area versus the as-built impervious <br /> area. Results from our calculations are summarized in the table below. <br /> �� <br /> Runoff Volume from a Subsurface Storage <br /> Impervious Area* (SF) Z-yr S'torm(CF) (CF) <br /> Approved' As-Built !� <br /> Approved As-Built Required Provided'`* <br /> 75'-250' 250'-500' 75'-250' 250'-500' �� <br /> 2,563 395 2,857 454 691 �� 786 95 160 <br /> *Distances are measured from the lake. ' <br /> "`Assumes 40%voids in the rock. � <br /> � � <br /> • The City is concerned that the absence of the originally proposed and approved drainage swales <br /> following the lot lines will result in excess flows routed to the adjacent neighboring properties. <br /> The draintile system has been determined to convey and store runoff generated by storms up to a <br /> total rainfall depth of 0.8". For comparison purposes, 2-yr, 10-yr,and 100-yr storm depths are <br /> 2.8",4.2", and 6.0", respectively. When storm depths exceed 0.8",the draintile system will <br /> become overwhelmed and runoff generated from the entire site(impervious and peroious areas) <br /> � <br /> � <br /> i . <br /> i <br /> � <br /> I <br /> . ; <br /> ; <br />