Laserfiche WebLink
� , � <br /> 05-3143 <br /> Page 2 of 2 . <br /> 19 July 2007 <br /> Per the conditions of the Resolution, staff is requesting .Council review of the revised proposal for a <br /> determination of whether the increases in hardcover are the result of'unforeseen_grading issues and are still in <br /> keeping with the intent of the variance approval or if corrections and hardcover reductions should be made. The ' <br /> existing hardcover and grading is reflected on the newly submitted as-built(attached:as Exhibit A). While the <br /> grading appears�to work, the hardcover exceeds the level that was approved. The additions in hardcover are <br /> essentially changes to the driveway, and sidewalk, as well as extensive boulder retaining walls which were not <br /> originally proposed, but may have been the result of choices with site grading without understanding the <br /> ramifications of those choices. � - � <br /> The applicant has installed downspouts which drain to the underground, drain-tile system which prevents the <br /> excess water from draining off of the roof and across the site. However any excesses in hardcover or significant <br /> changes to an approved plan should be discussed with the Planning Department and consideration should be <br /> given to City Council approved plans. <br /> COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED � � <br /> Refer the applicant to the Planning�Commission for after-the-fact consideration and approval of the excess 380 <br /> s.f. total site hardcbver OR direct Staff�to amend the Resolution 5377 to allow the excess 380 s.f. without � <br /> � further review. • <br /> ' ��, <br />