My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 2:13:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2012 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> R � <br /> , �I <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3312 Gary DeSantis,Continued) � <br /> , 4 <br /> � <br /> Gaffron stated setback variances would not be necessary but a variance to the lot width requirement <br /> would be necessary. Gaffron noted Lot 1 is approximately 50 to 60 feet wide and would require 200 feet <br /> in lot width, and Lot 2 is 120 or 130 feet in width and would also require 200 feet in lot width. <br /> Rice questioned why the City would approve something so substandard if they have lot width <br /> requirements. � <br /> � <br /> Zullo stated the ordinance probably relates more to new developments. <br /> Curtis noted this is a two-acre zone. :� <br /> � <br /> Berg stated the applicants is unable to split these lots without variances and that the Planning Commission <br /> is basically giving some direction to the applicant on whether they feel what they are proposing would be <br /> acceptable. - � - <br /> Gaffron stated as long as you have two acres and the house meets the setback requirements,the lot width <br /> would not be as critical in that type of situation as in other situations. <br /> . y <br /> Gronberg stated a driveway could also be run on the northerly lot on the north side and a house <br /> consiructed further to the east. � <br /> Berg commented she is not opposed to the strangely configured lots. <br /> Zullo stated she would like the driveway and cul-de-sac blacktopped,with a survey being conducted to <br /> verify the buildable area. � � <br /> The Planning Commission took no formal action on this application. <br /> . =� <br /> PLANNING COMIVIISSION COMMENTS " <br /> 9. REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br /> COUNCIL MEETINGS AUGUST 27,2007,AND SEPTEMBER 10,2007 <br /> .� <br /> Rice reported on the September 10�'City Council meeting,n`'oting that the Marzan application was <br /> approved with a smaller landing. The George Sticlrney application was denied at 27 percent hardcover. <br /> The development at 875 Wayzata Boulevard was tabled but would likely be approved at the next council <br /> • meeting. <br /> fi <br /> Gaffron stated the City is still working on an agreement with the City of Wayzata on the sewer and water <br /> for the 875 Wayzata Boulevard application. <br /> Gaffron stated for the October 3'�work session of the Planning Commission he would like to discuss the <br /> City's policy for hardcover and different items that should be codified. <br /> � <br /> PAGE 21 ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.