Laserfiche WebLink
T � <br /> #07-3317 <br /> 11 October 2007 � <br /> Page 4 of 4 . <br /> The applicant has employed a number of different methods of dealing with the storm <br /> . water from the site; rain gutters, downspouts directed to an underground drain tile <br /> system, additional grading and installation of retaining walls. Staff finds that while these <br /> methods are effective they require permitting and review by the City Engineer. The <br /> Engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit F. The applicant has been repeatedly <br /> . asked to have the underground drain tile system incorporated into the "as-built" survey. <br /> To date that has not been completed. . <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Should hardcover reductions be required in an effort to be consistent with the <br /> previously approved variance on this lot? Or has the applicant provided the <br /> minimal hardcover necessary in order to mitigate the discrepancies in the survey <br /> and the house plans? <br /> - 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> The Planning Commission may, if they determine the changes made to the site plan by <br /> the applicant are reasonable, forward a recommendation for approval to the City <br /> Council. Should the Planning Commission feel that there are areas for hardcover <br /> reduction; the applicant should be given very specific direction. <br /> . , <br />