Laserfiche WebLink
, f ,� <br /> _ <br /> ��� �� � � <br /> I . <br /> Draft PC Minutes—September 17,2007 i <br /> 1 <br /> #07-3305 LAKE COUNTRY BUII,DER�I ON BEHALF OF JAMES ZIlVIl�ZERMAN,2745 <br /> SHADYWOOD ROAD,VARIANCE,6:06 P.M.—6:30 P.M. <br /> I <br /> Gregg Graten,Jim Zierman,and Peter Jacobson, Lake Count�Bui�lders,were present. <br /> � �,� <br /> CurEis noted this application was tabled at a previ.Gus Planning.Commission eetin followin a <br /> detailed discussion of the proposal. The applicant is r quesfing=7 foot hardc vegan�ake g <br /> setback variances in order to construct addit�lons t the existing'home an h�e proposed tw�o new <br /> options. Option 1 includes a pergola with a`'existi patio a��the sound end of the rop rty�at the <br /> � ��.�� � <br /> pomt, and Option 2 mcludes a screen porch�ith a balcon'y above. �' <br /> 1 <br /> On Friday Staff received an e-mail with pictures�of fhe properry attached,��vhich was forwarded to <br /> � j�..� �. <br /> the Commissioners. It appears the appl�cant has responded to the�direction given at the August <br /> Planning Commission meeting by sub�ittmg4 Opt on���aff feels t�he revised proposal is more <br /> , il � � <br /> reasonable than what was ori ina'll�� ro�o ed. The inassin � <br /> $� y� p I � �g on.th�_e point end of the property has <br /> been somewhat minimized. The he�ght of th i structu"re contin�s to meet Code requirements and <br /> � `�_ = : <br /> the rooflines are not extre e�. '�'h�continuel to be a,per.go'a over the existing patio on the point <br /> end of the home. The pe�la does�continue t�o the structural coverage level and minimall to the <br /> overall structu"""�ra]'�"°m`a'ssing on t e lot. �± <br /> , ,. � y <br /> ; : <br /> dn addition�,Staff has receaved information om the City Attorney confirmin the a licant's <br /> g PP <br /> , positio on the easemen for a turn�around. V�ile it may not function as a turnaround for the <br /> °' ��neig b rnood,the fire mars�h'a7 rnai�'ntairis that��residence located 150 feet from the public <br /> roadway m st,provide a turn'�aroun�for emerg I ncy vehicles. The turnaround should not be <br /> � <br /> nanower,than l�0 15 fe"e m v�d h. This wo�ld require the hardcover in the existing driveway <br /> �. � ���,.�_� :. � <br /> to be mainta� ed at its curren�width. � <br /> I <br /> � ' <br /> Staff feels the property is currently being put to reasonable use and to further the nonconformities <br /> . 1 <br /> with the proposed additions is excessive. Staff�continues to recommend denial. However, should <br /> � . i� <br /> the Planning Commission find that the applica I's revised plans meet their direction,then an <br /> I <br /> approval recommendation should be forwardedjto the City Council for their review. Curtis noted <br /> � <br /> the requirements of the fire marshal dictate the need for revised hardcover calculations. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � 1 <br /> � <br /> � <br /> I <br />