Laserfiche WebLink
1 ( I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> � <br /> Curtis noted Exhibit D to the Planner's Report I�llustrates the existing hardcover on the lot. <br /> Kempf stated this is definitely a hardship lot and noted that current structural coverage is at 13 percent. <br /> Kempf stated he does not perceive that the expansions would negatively impact the view of the <br /> neighbors. Kempf inquired whether what the height of the new roof would be. ' <br /> �I� <br /> Curtis stated the highest point of the roof would�be at 29 feet. <br /> I <br /> Kempf commented he likes the step-down of the roofline to help reduce the massmg of the structure and <br /> that he does not see the addition toward the garage end of the property as adding considerably to the <br /> . � � • <br /> I� <br /> (#07-3305 James Zimmerman,2745 Shadywo�Od Road,Continued) <br /> I <br /> � massing. Kempf expressed concerns regarding the addition toward the point as giving the appearance of <br /> a substantial amount of massing. I <br /> Curtis stated there may be a possibility that duri Ig construction the house would be cut down to the cap <br /> and would be rebuilt. Curtis mquired whether the Planning Commission has any concerns if this <br /> becomes a part of the project. � � � <br /> Jacobson stated they are attempting to come up w�th a plan for adding to the house and that they have <br /> not thought about aspect. Jacobson stated he d�d not think about removing the house down to the cap. <br /> i <br /> Kroeger asked if the house is on a slab. � � � . <br /> � <br /> t <br /> Graten stated it is a slab on grade. '� <br /> � <br /> Curtis stated she wanted to bring that issue up so that all the parties would be aware of it. <br /> Jacobson stated as part of the next step they would�be looking at that more closely. <br /> Winer stated she would be in agreement with sticking more closely to the existing patio slab. <br /> Kroeger stated his understanding of the hardship ci�ed by the property owners is the need to upgrade the <br /> house to fit m more wrth the neighborhood. <br /> Graten stated that is a portion of the hardship but that there is a large portion of hardcover dedicated to <br /> the turnaround,which makes it di�cult to build on`the lot without doing a lot of modification to the <br /> driveway in exchange for the new hardcover. � <br /> � <br /> Kempf stated the property owner has reasonable usei of the property currently but that what is being <br /> proposed for this lot in this neighborhood is not excessive. <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> Jacobson commented it is difficult to define what reasonable use is for every person and that how a <br /> house fits into a neighborhood should be taken into account. Jacobson noted they are also proposing to <br /> make improvements to the lot to address environmental issues relating to the lake. <br /> i <br /> Kroeger indicated he is in agreement with the comments made earlier by Chair Kempf on the visual <br /> impact of the expansions from different points on the lot and that he would like to see the expansion <br /> toward the point be modified. � <br /> � � <br /> i <br /> � <br /> i <br /> I <br /> , <br />