Laserfiche WebLink
°� <br /> . s <br /> t <br /> Ji <br /> ' MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 0{clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3315 Donna and Michael Ebertz, Continue`d) <br /> . ,� <br /> Kang moved,Zullo seconded,to recommend approval of Application#07-3315, 1220 Tonkawa <br /> Road,based upon the requirement that the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone only consist of the 134 <br /> � square feet of existing rip-rap,that the hardcover'in the 75-250 foot zone not exceed what is . <br /> currently proposed at 50:8 percent, and that the applicant,meet the recommendations of the City <br /> Engineer. VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 1,Rice opposed: <br /> Rice stated she would like to see the hardcover reduced further in the 75-250 foot zone. <br /> 6. #07-3316 MARC ASHTON WITH JOHN;TERRANCE HOMES,LCC, ON BEHALF OF <br /> MITCH COOK OF CENTRAL BANK AND LARRY PALM OF LGL REAL ESTATE <br /> INVESTMENTS,7:10 P.M.—8:20 P.M. <br /> � <br /> Todd Mohagen,John Terrance Homes, and Larry Pal�nn,LGL Real Estate,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are requesting approval of a commercial site plan and preliminary plat, as well <br /> as rezoning from RR-1B to R-6 PUD. The pertinent�issues regarding this application are outlined in the <br /> Planner's Report. Staff would like the applicant to co"mment on their application since they have recently . . <br /> submitted some information in response to Staff's report but Staff has not had an opportunity to review <br /> the information. • � <br /> The parcel is the undeveloped parcel of Stone Bay Outlot A, located at the northwest corner of the <br /> intersection of Wayzata Boulevard and Willow Drive.�The property is zoned RR-1B and guided B6, <br /> Highway Commercial PUD,which allows office uses with minor retail arid service uses allowed as <br /> accessory uses to an office use. The proposed bank wi'th a drive-up facility/office building are consistent <br /> with this designation. � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> The Planning Commission should address the issues noted in the summary of issues for discussion and <br /> determine whether there are specific elements that need revision and further Planning Commission review <br /> before forwarding this to City Council. Curtis noted the City Engineer also has not had a chance to <br /> review the revisions. ;�. <br /> '� <br /> � Mohagen commented their overall plan works well with the area and is similar to what was previously <br /> approved by the City for this site. Being proposed are two 2-story, 20,000 square foot office buildings <br /> without a retail component. Staff's report did point out some errors in their plan associated with the <br /> parking stalls,which are depicted at 18.5 feet,and Orono's Code requires 20.9 feet. Mohagen indicated <br /> they have submitted two plans showing the two different size parking lots. <br /> Curtis stated it would benefit the Planning Commission if they were given an overview of what they are � <br /> proposing since many of them were not part of the other proposals for this site. <br /> r <br /> Mohagen displayed an overhead depicting their proposal'and the layout of the site. Mohagen indicated <br /> that visibility and a sensitivity toward the amount of parlpng were two issues that were taken into <br /> consideration and that they have attempted to break the parking up into smaller areas. Mohagen <br /> distributed a 3D illustration of the site looking from the east and from the west. <br /> ;� <br /> d <br /> PAGE 9� <br /> , <br />