Laserfiche WebLink
Y ! <br /> FILE 07-3308 <br /> August 20,2007 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Background <br /> In application#02-2853 the property was granted an average lakeshore setback for <br /> construction of a replacement residence. The basis for the variance was the location of the <br /> sanitary sewer line,which crosses the property on the road side of the house. The house was <br /> actually constructed about seven feet farther from the lake than approved (see e�ibit E). <br /> The 16 foot deep by 13 foot high pergola would be constructed of inetal. It would extend <br /> along the lakeside of the house at the walkout level. <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width• <br /> Re uired Actual <br /> Lot Area lacre 3.4 acres <br /> Lot Width 140 feet 195 feet <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Hardship Statement • <br /> Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as E�ibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> In considering applications for variance,the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed <br /> variance upon the healtl:, safety and welfare of t/:e community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br /> ligl:t and air, danger of fire, risk to tl:e public safety,and tlse effect on values of property in the surrounding <br /> area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal <br /> provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardsl:ip <br /> because of circumstances unique to the individua[property under consideration, and s/:al! recommend � <br /> approval only w1:en it is demonstrated t/:at suc/: actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of tl:e <br /> Orono Zoning Code. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> The proposed pergola would have no impact on the lakeshore views of the house to the <br /> southeast (975) as that house is located closer to the lake. The house to the northwest (935) <br /> is located farther from the lake but the first floor elevation of 935 is approximately 15 feet <br /> higher than the first floor elevation of the Applicants' house. Only a small corner of the <br /> pergola encroaches on the sight line established by the corner of the Applicant's house. <br /> Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval. <br />