Laserfiche WebLink
�� � <br /> t� ��. <br /> } � <br /> Date Application Received: 07/18/07 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 07/23/07 <br /> 60-Day Review Period Extension Expiration: 09/23/07 <br /> To: Chair Kempf and Planning Commission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planning &Zoning Coordinator ' <br /> Date: August 15, 2007 <br /> Subject: 07-3309, Maureen Breckman, 2695 Casco Point Road, <br /> Renewal Variances Lot Width, Lot Area, and Hardcover <br /> . � Public Hearing <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential, '/2 acre/100' <br /> Lot Area: 0.45 acre or 19,572 s.f. <br /> Lot Width: 60' <br /> Application Summary: This application was approved in 2006. Since that time there has <br /> been little or no activity on the property. The applicant is the property owner and wishes <br /> to renew the variances which were reviously a roved in order to sell the ro erty. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning StafF recommends approval of the .variances as <br /> requested with conditions. <br /> Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br /> • Sec. 78-350. Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. <br /> • Sec. 78-1288. Hard cover limitations. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A - Application& Hardcover pocumentation <br /> Exhibit B- Resolution No. 5488; Adopted July, 24, 2006 <br /> Exhibit C- Origina12006 PC & Council Packets <br /> Background <br /> This property received variances in 2006, after much deliberation, in order to build a new <br /> single family residence. The property owner has decided to market the property rather <br /> than building a house for herself on the lot. In order to do so, and to make it more <br /> marketable, she would like to have the City consider renewing the same variance <br /> "package" which was previously approved. <br /> With the 2006 approval, the existing home on the property was demolished. In its place <br /> remains an excavation that has become something of an eyesore/concern for the <br /> immediate neighborhood. Staff would recommend that the applicant resolve this <br /> situation by filling in the excavated hole prior to the City Council's review of this <br /> application. <br />