Laserfiche WebLink
�, } <br /> � + <br /> FILE#07-3305 <br /> '� 14 August 2007 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Hardcover& Lake Setback Variances <br /> The applicant is requesting variances to allow lakeward and upward structural expansions <br /> of the existing home. Since the over 99% of the property is located within the 75' <br /> setback area, the property cannot be built on without variances. The existing home is <br /> approximately 25 feet wide and 75 feet long. The expansions proposed will almost <br /> double the width and add nearly 15 feet in length; all while bringing it closer to the lake <br /> � on all sides. Resolution No. 3027, which granted variance approval for the previous <br /> application, is attached as Exhibit C. Please review the site plan attached to that <br /> resolution and compare it to Exhibit D. While there may be discrepancies between the <br /> hardcover analyses from one surveyor to another it does appear that the level of <br /> hardcover since 1991 has increased slightly in sidewalks, etc. <br /> Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> The entire home on the property is located ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. <br /> Technically staff identifies this as a setback variance although it may be administratively <br /> granted due to the nature of the property. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission s/tal! consider tl:e effect of tlie <br /> proposed variance upon tl:e healt/r,safety and welfare of tlie community, existing ar:d anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, lig/:t and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and tl:e effect on values of properry in <br /> tlie surrounding area. TI:e Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br /> from tl:e litera[provisions of t/:e Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause <br /> undue /iards/iip because of circumstances unique to the individual properry under consideration, and' <br /> slral!recomme�:d approva[only when it is demonstrated tl:at such actions wi11 be in keeping witlz tlre <br /> spirit and intenf of tl:e Orono Zoning Code. <br /> Staff finds that while 99% of the applicant's property is located ahead of the 75' setback <br /> the property itself may be maxed out on hardcover as it exists. To construct additional <br /> structural hardcover, toward the lake on all sides, may be reaching the level of excess. <br /> The property owner has a reasonable use of the property in the existing home. To add <br /> additional structure to this already overtaaced lot at such a close proximity to the lake is <br /> unreasonable. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. The Planning Commission should discuss the merits of each of the applicant's <br /> . Options and give the applicant direction. <br /> 2. Would the proposed structural additions give the appearance of excessive mass <br /> when viewed from the lake? When viewed from neighboring properties? <br /> 3. Would the Planning Commission support structural additions (with additional <br /> hardcover reductions) toward the rear of the property at no greater encroachment <br /> toward the lake? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends denial of the variances. <br /> 3 <br />