Laserfiche WebLink
Y �, <br /> FILE#07-3303 <br /> July 16,2007 <br /> .. Page 5 of 5 <br /> Building Desi�n and Materials: Is the design of the buildings appropriate? Are the materials <br /> acceptable alternatives to the listed materials? <br /> " Conformitv with the B-4 District Standards: The proposed development requires variances <br /> from several significant zoning district standards, including setbacks,hardcover, structural <br /> • lot coverage, number of parking stalls, and even lot size. Except for the number of parking <br /> spaces,the need for variances is created by the applicant's attempt to develop the site in a � <br /> PUD context but under standard platting and zoning ordinances. The two do not mix. <br /> While the site layout or one similar to it may ultimately be deemed as reasonable,the variety <br /> of variances associated with the proposal is of a magnitude that can't be supported by staff. <br /> Under standard platting, which is the only process available for this site, each lot must stand <br /> on its own, meeting the standards for lot area, hardcover, lot coverage, setbacks, etc. as well <br /> as the limitation of one principal structure per lot. Under a PUD process (which Orono's <br /> ordinances do not provide for the Navarre commercial area)the entire site would be reviewed <br /> as a single entity, and the standards would be applied to the site,not each individual lot. The <br /> B-4 standards do allow for shared parking on adjoining(commercial) lots. <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning staff recommends that the Planning Commission review and comment on the <br /> following policy issues: <br /> l. Proposed use of residentially zoned portion of property for commercial parking <br /> area and stormwater management. What are the ramifications of rezoning the <br /> back portion of the property from LR-1B to B-4? Would PC support such a <br /> rezoning? It would have to be accompanied by a Comp Plan Amendment... <br /> 2. General site layout, including the extensive grading,virtually total tree removal, <br /> etc � <br /> 3. Building design and materials <br /> 4. Conformity with B-4 District and related zoning standards. Absent zoning code <br /> allowances for commercial PUD development in the Navarre area,will Planning <br /> Commission support any deviation from the B-4 standards (note that hardcover <br /> and lot coverage are calculated by the architect on Sheet A1.0 for the entire site, <br /> not lot-by-lot). <br /> 5. Note that the City attempted to create a Commercial PUD ordinance for the <br /> Navarre area nearly 5 years ago,but it did not move forward because the <br /> conclusion was that such an ordinance should follow,rather than precede, a <br /> comprehensive study of zoning and future redevelopment/investment in Navarre; <br /> such work is underway, but not proceeding so quickly as to assist this developer. <br /> Does Planning Commission have any comments on this? <br />