My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-18-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-18-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 3:39:42 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 3:39:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� ( <br /> � � �� Page 1 of 3 PC Eachibit B <br /> HARaSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM <br /> This form is a required submittal for ALL variance apptications. An application <br /> wilf not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br /> compiete and submitted to the City. <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br /> demons#rated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br /> properly as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Persona!and economic <br /> situations are nof considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br /> demonstrated. <br /> HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? <br /> This forrn has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship <br /> exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br /> address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possibie. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the <br /> variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a <br /> denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may <br /> not apply): <br /> 1. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls." <br /> variance requested to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10. 24 <br /> u ivision B to permit the construction of a new residence <br /> on a..�roFer � th t- �n�; �+-� nf � A ;�a�p-�f--=r_1L a F a^res <br /> � where 43 ,560 s.f. or 1 acre is required. <br /> 2. "The plight of the fandowner is due to circumstances unique to his properly not <br /> created by the landowner." <br /> Correct. <br /> 3. "The variance, if granted, will not alter the essentiat character of the locality." <br /> The 19,920 s f lot is �consistent with developed lots_wi�hin <br /> the neighborhood ran in from 12 000 s.f. . to 37 000 s.f. <br /> 4, "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if . <br /> reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Cha�iter." <br /> �, �,� �y'�`;� ;, ; <br /> : �'�. �; �., <br /> ��9 y. ' '��'�... `�� '� . <br /> � � a� <br /> ���� �� 'e � .� <br /> �� � .� 3 �, ,y <br /> ,d..� c) -,�� <br /> �� 'r!�� c�.��' � <br /> �`�..�,._ v_c':"i>..^sa '�`:�:r'ss ( <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.