Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#07-3288 <br /> ' 14 May 2007 <br /> ' , Page:2 of 3 <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width: <br /> . RR-1B Lot Area � Lot Width <br /> Re uired 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' <br /> Actual• 370,109 s.f. (8.5 total acre) 379.5' <br /> . Accessorv Structure Setbacks: . � <br /> RR-1B Re uired Existin Pro osed <br /> Front 50' 210' 210' <br /> Rear 50' � 500'+ 500'+ <br /> East Side 30' 33.5' Addition 44.1' <br /> West Side 30' 300'+ 300'+ <br /> Structnral Covera�e: <br /> As the property exceeds 2.0 acres;the structural coverage limitation does not apply. <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> . The applicants' property is not within the 1000' shoreland overlay district; hardcover <br /> restrictions do not apply. � <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------- . <br /> Variance: Accessory Building ahead of Principal Building <br /> The applicants currently have two separate accessory buildings (garages) located between � <br /> the home and Fox Street. They would like to attach the two buildings with an addition to <br /> increase the indoor storage space for vehicles, etc. The applicants have proposed a <br /> configuration that will remain within the allowed square footage for their property area. � <br /> The additions will not result in the building moving any closer to the street than existing. <br /> I�fardshap Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Bxhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application: <br /> Hardship Analysis ' <br /> b� considering applicatioirs for vnria��ce, tlte Planning Co�nmission shall consitler the effect of the <br /> proposet!variance uporr iJ�e ltealt/i,sufety«nd welfare of tlte commiutity, existi�Tg and anticipated traffic . <br /> cofrtlitions, lig/tt trnd air, dnnger of ftre, risk to the public safety, and the effect ar vnlues of property in <br /> the surrounding area. The P[a�t�ri�rg Commission shal!consitler recomnte�:di�rg approval for variances <br /> � fro»: tlre litera[provisions of tlre Zari�rg Code i�r i�rstances wl►ere tl:eir strict enforceme�tt would cause <br /> uirdue Irardsl�ip becattse of circu»rsta►rces unique to the indivitkial properry u�tder co�rsirleratio�r, a�rrl <br /> shall recon:me�rd npproval o�rly wlte�r it is tlemoristrated t/tat suc/t actions rvi!/ be i�t keepiirg wit/r tlie <br /> spirit and inte�rt of the Orono Zoliiirg Code. <br /> Considering the location of the existing accessory structures and the configuration of the � <br /> proposed additions the applicants' proposal is reasonable. The combined building will not <br /> 2 <br />