My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 3:26:55 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING � <br /> . Monday,Apri116,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3225 David Carlson,Continued) <br /> 1. In November the Planning Commission discussed the potential impacts of this development on <br /> Luce Line Trail users and ways to mitigate those impacts. • <br /> � • 2. The preliminary plat has each lot extending through the wetland,with individual ownership of <br /> wetland rather than association ownership. � <br /> ;, <br /> 3. The proposed 20 foot roadway width is substantially less than the 28 foot width required by the <br /> subdivision code for private roads serving more than seven homes; the Fire Marshall will be <br /> ased to add'ress whether this meets the minimum provisions of the Fire Code. <br /> 4. Access to the site will be via the existing driveway access location. Discussions with MnDOT . � <br /> and Hennepin County about a possible `roundabout' replacing the semaphore at Old 12 and <br /> Wayzata Boulevard are ongoing. Access to the Montessori School across Highway 12 has been <br /> an issue of late, and there may be future access revisions that will affect the applicants' <br /> properly. <br /> 5. The Planning Commission should review the Conservation Design information provided and <br /> _ consider whether it comprehensively addresses all identified concerns. <br /> 6. The applicant should provide updated elevation views of the dwelling units. <br /> 7. With regards to meeting Metropolitan Council's 3.0 units per acre requirement for new <br /> . development within the MUSA,the applicant provided an analysis to show that by excluding <br /> certain land types from the calculation per Metropolitan Council guidelines,the three units per <br /> ace standard may be met. It is possible that Metropolitan Council will require that the westerly� � <br /> triangular portion of the site be either placed in a conservation easement or be donated to the <br /> ' city or MnDNR. The Planning Commission might consider whether acceptance of an open <br /> space easement over this land would be appropriate. Such an easement could allow for <br /> development of additional natural screening of the Luce Line from new Highway 12. <br /> Kroeger noted Planner Gaffron had commented on the MIJSA requirements of three units per acre and <br /> inquired whether the entire wetland would be included in that calculation. � <br /> Gaffron stated the Metropolitan Council's standards for calculating the three units per density allow you <br /> to take out land that is not buildable as well as wetlands, and Staff has been advised that the <br /> Metropolitan Council is olcay with removing the wetlands, stormwater ponds under easements,wetland <br /> buffers,but not the 20-foot wetland setbacks as part of that calculation. . <br /> Kroeger asked whether the property owner would still own those sections that would be taken out of <br /> that calculation. - <br /> Gaffron stated they would. <br /> PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.