My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 3:26:55 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TI3E • • <br /> . ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING � <br /> Monday,Apri116,2007 <br /> _ 6:00 o'clock p.m. - <br /> (#07-3284 Michael Sharratt,Continued) • <br /> Gaffron stated if no further motions are forthcoming,this application would go before the Council with <br /> a tie vote. � <br /> Zullo inquired whether the issue is the location of the pool. <br /> Rice stated the Planning Commission needs to look at whether there is a hardship for granting the . <br /> variances and that the applicant already has reasonable use of the property. <br /> Curtis stated the City Attorney has been speaking with Staff relating to hardship and that the Planning <br /> Commission has the ability to also consider whether the applicant's request is reasonable and approve it <br /> on that basis. <br /> Zullo moved to recommend approval of Application#07-3284,Sharratt Design on behalf of Tom <br /> and Kristen R.itchie,2507 Kelly Avenue,as submitted,not based on hardship but based on the <br /> � fact that this is a reasonable replacement for the stewardship of th'e property to reduce hardcover. <br /> Motion failed due to a lack of.a second. <br /> Sharratt stated there is a nonconfonlung situation that currently exists and the question the Planning <br /> Commission should ask whether the proposal improves the situation. . <br /> . Gaffron stated the siivation that exists is technically not nonconforming but rather illegally <br /> nonconforming and the Planning Commission should take into consideration what is fair and what is <br /> reasonable for this lot. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission consider whether the hardcover <br /> could be reduced to 25 percent, and if it cannot be,then look at the variance request. <br /> Kempf inquired how much total hardcover is being requested. <br /> Curtis stated there is a net loss on the entire property. <br /> Kroeger stated the proposed pool adds hardcover to the lot. ' <br /> Gaffron stated what exists is 10,177 square feet of hardcover,which is 1330 square feet over what has <br /> been legally allowed. Gaffron stated with the proposed changes,the property would be over by ' <br /> approximately six hundred and some square feet of hardcover,but that the applicant is also proposing to <br /> add a rain garden and a buffer. Gaffron recommended the Planning Commission exercise caulion when <br /> considering all the benefits that they are being told they will receive in granting additional hardcover <br /> over what is allowed. <br /> Kroeger inquired how many square feet exist in the illegal patio. <br /> . PAGE 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.